Skip to content

Flex-Neck® 00884450330241Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Flex-Neck (11)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450330241), received between Jul 17, 2020 and Sep 27, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fluid/Blood Leak” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Fracture1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Peritonitis1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 27, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT, POST PROCEDURE, A PATIENT WAS BEING TREATED FOR A TUNNEL INFECTION AND EMPIRICALLY FOR PERITONITIS. A CVC WAS PLACED FOR TREATMENT. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: Peritonitis

    MAUDE report 20321802 ↗
  • InjurySep 25, 2024Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak

    THE CUSTOMER ALLEGES THEY ARE HAVING ISSUES GETTING A CATHETER TO WORK. WHEN TRYING TO FLUSH WITH A SYRINGE, THEY REALIZED THAT THE FLUID SEEMED TO BE GOING INTO THE PATIENT'S TUNNEL, CREATING A BUBBLE BETWEEN INCISIONS IN THE CATHETER TUNNEL. THE PATIENT WAS STARTED ON ANTIBIOTICS FOR THE TUNNEL INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 20300532 ↗
  • MalfunctionSep 11, 2020Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, A PLASTIC CONNECTION DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED THE DEVICE LAPAROSCOPICALLY WITH NO ADDITIONAL CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. A NEW DEVICE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 10521322 ↗
  • InjuryJul 17, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT A PATIENT HAD A PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACED. THE CATHETER WAS NOT WORKING SO THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE HOSPITAL. THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED FOR A LAPAROSCOPIC SCOPE PROCEDURE. THE PHYSICIAN FOUND THAT CATHETER HAD ADHERED TO THE PERITONEAL WALL OF THE PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN ALSO NOTED THAT A CATHETER GUIDE ASSEMBLY WAS LEFT WITHIN THE PATIENT FROM THE LAST IMPLANT PROCEDURE. THE ASSEMBLY WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT AND THE PHYSICIAN COMPLETED SOME MINOR MAINTENANCE ON THE CATHETER. THE PD CATHETER WAS LEFT WITHIN THE PATIENT FOR CONTINUED USE. THE PHYSICIAN STATED THAT THERE WERE NO SIGNS OF INFECTION. NO PATIENT INJURY TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10289910 ↗

Other Catheter, peritoneal, long-term indwelling devices

All Catheter, peritoneal, long-term indwelling devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page