Surfacer®Recalls & reported problems
Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450762158), received between Nov 25, 2025 and Aug 20, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Patient Device Interaction Problem3
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- Hemothorax2
- Cardiac Arrest1
- Cardiovascular Dysfunction/Insufficiency1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 20, 2026Material Separation
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50356342 ↗InjuryNov 26, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
IN A LITERATURE ARTICLE (BOHLE, 2023), CUSTOMER REPORTS " DURING SURFACER INSIDE-OUT CENTRAL VENOUS RECANALIZATION, PATIENT SUSTAINED RIGHT INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY LACERATION WITH MASSIVE HEMOTHORAX AND CARDIOVASCULAR COLLAPSE; MANAGED WITH TRANSFUSION, CHEST TUBE, AND ARTERIAL COIL EMBOLIZATION. DEVICE USE INTRA-PROCEDURE IMPLICATED; ADVANCED IMAGING SUGGESTED INJURY RISK ALONG PROJECTED DEVICE PATH."
Patient problems: Cardiovascular Dysfunction/Insufficiency; Hemothorax
MAUDE report 23658628 ↗InjuryNov 25, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
IN A LITERATURE ARTICLE (PUPPALA ET AL., 2025), CUSTOMER REPORTS " AN ADVERSE EVENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE SURFACER SYSTEM WAS IDENTIFIED IN A 2025 U.S. CASE REPORT. A PATIENT SUFFERED A CARDIAC ARREST DURING OR FOLLOWING SURFACER PROCEDURE. DETAILS OF RESUSCITATION AND PATIENT OUTCOME WERE NOT SPECIFIED IN THE ABSTRACT BUT WERE TEMPORALLY LINKED TO THE DEVICE USE."
Patient problems: Cardiac Arrest
MAUDE report 23645279 ↗InjuryNov 25, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
IN A LITERATURE ARTICLE (BOHLE ET AL., 2023), CUSTOMER REPORTS "A 71-YEAR-OLD FEMALE UNDERGOING SURFACER INSIDE-OUT CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER PLACEMENT FOR THORACIC CENTRAL VENOUS OCCLUSION EXPERIENCED A NEAR-FATAL ARTERIAL INJURY. DURING ADVANCEMENT OF THE DEVICE, THE RIGHT INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY WAS INADVERTENTLY LACERATED, RESULTING IN MASSIVE BLEEDING AND CARDIOVASCULAR COLLAPSE. THE PATIENT REQUIRED TRANSFUSION, CHEST TUBE PLACEMENT, AND COIL EMBOLIZATION OF THE INJURED ARTERY. IMAGING REVIEW POST-PROCEDURE REVEALED THE TRAJECTORY OF THE DEVICE INTERSECTED THE ARTERY, INDICATING POTENTIAL FOR INJURY DUE TO ANATOMICAL VARIATION. THE EVENT RESULTED IN HEMOTHORAX AND PROLONGED HOSPITALIZATION, BUT THE PATIENT ULTIMATELY RECOVERED."
Patient problems: Hemothorax
MAUDE report 23645271 ↗
Other Reverse central venous recanalization system devices
- Surfacer Inside-Out Access Catheter System 600200/ABluegrass Vascular Technologies, Inc. · Reverse Central Venous Recanalization System4 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.