Transducer X7-2t 989605361911Recalls & reported problems
Philips Ultrasound LLC · Class 2
All models of Transducer X7-2t (4)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
2 open recalls name this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 2
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884838023987), received between Dec 3, 2019 and Dec 8, 2020 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Mechanical Jam” (1 report).
2 FDA recall records name this device's identifier, 2 still open.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Recalls naming this device
- Jul 3, 2025Class IIIOpen, Classified
To provide clarification and labelling to define the useful life of ultrasound transducers in the field.
Z-2412-2025 · Root cause: Device Design · Recall details · FDA record ↗
- May 28, 2025Class IIOpen, Classified
Ultrasound transducer devices were refurbished beyond their useful life.
Z-2066-2025 · Root cause: Process control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Mechanical Jam1
- Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 8, 2020Mechanical Jam; Mechanical Jam
A CUSTOMER REPORTED AN X7-2T MODEL TRANSDUCER EXPERIENCED AN ARTICULATION ISSUE DURING USE. THERE WAS NO INJURY ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10971221 ↗MalfunctionDec 3, 2019Therapeutic or Diagnostic Output Failure
A CUSTOMER REPORTED THEIR X7-2T MODEL TRANSDUCER WAS NOT FULLY ADJUSTING THE ARTICULATION ANGLE. THERE WAS NO INJURY ASSOCIATED WITH THIS EVENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9405817 ↗
Other Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic devices
- Site~Rite 8 Ultrasound System 9770603Bard Access Systems, Inc. · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic620 reports
- ULTRASONIC PROBE UM-S20-17SOlympus Medical Systems Corp. · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic2 deaths344 reports
- Transducer X7-2t 989605414122Philips Ultrasound LLC · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic6 recalls21 reports
- EPIQ Diagnostic Ultrasound System 989605488741Philips Ultrasound LLC · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic3 recalls165 reports
- bk3000, bk3500, bk5000, bkActiv 2300Bk Medical Aps · Transducer, Ultrasonic, Diagnostic6 recalls1 report
- Transducer L12-3 989605412072Philips Ultrasound LLC · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic5 recalls1 report
- Transducer L15-7io 989605387852Philips Ultrasound LLC · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic5 recalls0 reports
- Transducer eL18-4 EMT 989605431531Philips Ultrasound LLC · Transducer, ultrasonic, diagnostic5 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page