Skip to content

CD HORIZON® Spinal System 7575540Recalls & reported problems

Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SCREW 7575540 LEGACY 5.5 CANN MAS 5.5X40 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of CD HORIZON Spinal System (342)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00885074030630), received between Mar 3, 2017 and Mar 11, 2026 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break4
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
  • No Code Available2
  • Pain2

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 11, 2026Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING SCREWS USED FOR MIST TLIF PROCED URE USING THE SEXTANT SPONDY SYSTEM. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREWS HEAD PULLED OUT DURING LOADING ON THE TOWER AND TIGHTENING WITH THE SCREWDRIVER. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT IMPLANTED AND NO FRAGMENT REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. THE SCREW WAS CHANGED IMMEDIATELY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE WAS A UNDESIRED BREAKING OF THE SCREW TULIP.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24566809 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 10, 2026Break; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTHCARE PROVIDER (HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING SCREWS USED FOR MIST TLIF PROCED URE USING THE SEXTANT SPONDY SYSTEM. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREWS HEAD PULLED OUT DURING LOADING ON THE TOWER AND TIGHTENING WITH THE SCREWDRIVER. THE PRODUCT WAS NOT IMPLANTED AND NO FRAGMENT REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. THE SCREW WAS CHANGED IMMEDIATELY. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THERE WAS A UNDESIRED BREAKING OF THE SCREW TULIP.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24556612 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PATIENT WITH PRE-OPERATIVE DIA GNOSIS FOR RADIOGRAPHY. PROCEDURE OR TECHNIQUE USED WAS MIS LOGITITUDEII SYSTEM. LEVELS IMPLANTED 4. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SCREW TULIP POPPED OUT AFTER THE SURGERY, REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED FOR REMOVING OTHER SCREWS FROM THE CONSTRUCT SCREWS HEADS GOT DAMAGED, SO ALL SCREWS WERE REPLACED. THERE WAS NO FRAGMENT LEFT INSIDE THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOMS OR COMPLICATIONS AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17569740 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2017Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT A SEXTANT SURGERY IN WHICH SCREWS WERE IMPLANTED AT L5-S1. POST-OP, THE SCREWS BROKE DUE TO WHICH THE PATIENT HAD BACK PAIN. ON (B)(6) 2017, A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED IN WHICH THE BROKEN SCREWS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH 2 NEW SCREWS.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 6375352 ↗
  • InjuryMar 3, 2017Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT UNDERWENT A SEXTANT SURGERY IN WHICH SCREWS WERE IMPLANTED AT L5-S1. POST-OP, THE SCREWS BROKE DUE TO WHICH THE PATIENT HAD BACK PAIN. ON 07 FEB 2017, A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED IN WHICH THE BROKEN SCREWS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH 2 NEW SCREWS.

    Patient problems: No Code Available; Pain

    MAUDE report 6375347 ↗

Other ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices

All ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page