Medtronic Reusable Instruments 8530630Recalls & reported problems
Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · INSTRUMENT 8530630 SCREWDRIVER SHAFT · Class 1
All models of Medtronic Reusable Instruments (36)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00885074540702), received between Feb 8, 2025 and Mar 3, 2025 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break5
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 3, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM HEALTH CARE PROVIDER VIA MANUFACTURING REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A PRODUCT IDENTIFIED DURING AN EVENT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT INSTRUMENT BROKEN. NO PATIENT WAS INVOLVED IN THIS EVENT. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED/ANTICIPATED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21502799 ↗MalfunctionFeb 24, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE FACILITY VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING AN INSTRUMENT USED FOR SPINAL THERAPY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DRIVER SHAFT WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVED AT THE TIME OF EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21443738 ↗MalfunctionFeb 21, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES (MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE, HEALTHCARE PROVIDER) REGARDING A DEVICE USED FOR LAMINO PLASTY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INSTRUMENT WAS BROKEN. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT REPORTED. THERE WERE NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS REPORTED REGARDING THE EVENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21429667 ↗MalfunctionFeb 8, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL(HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A DEVICE USED IN LAMINOPLASTY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE INSERTION OF THAT SCREW WAS STARTED UNDER A MICROSCOPE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT A SMALL PIECE OF METAL WAS ATTACHED TO THE SCREW HEAD, AND THAT SCREW WAS NOT USED. IT WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW SCREW OF THE SAME SIZE AND PLACED INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF THIS SURGERY WAS CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY. THE LEVEL AT WHICH THE IMPLANT WAS PERFORMED: C3/6. THERE WAS A DELAY OF LESS THAN 60 MINUTES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM IN THE EVENT AND NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS/SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE METAL FRAGMENT IS PART OF THE DRIVER. WHEN ATTACHED TO THE SCREW DRIVER AND CARRIED TO THE SURGICAL FIELD, A PIECE OF METAL WAS ATTACHED TO THE IMPLANT SCREW HEAD ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SCREWDRIVER. THEREFORE, IT WAS NOT USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21340135 ↗MalfunctionFeb 8, 2025Break; Break
INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM A HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL(HCP) VIA A MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE REGARDING A DEVICE USED IN LAMINOPLASTY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN THE INSERTION OF THAT SCREW WAS STARTED UNDER A MICROSCOPE, IT WAS NOTICED THAT A SMALL PIECE OF METAL WAS ATTACHED TO THE SCREW HEAD, AND THAT SCREW WAS NOT USED. IT WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW SCREW OF THE SAME SIZE AND PLACED INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. PREOPERATIVE DIAGNOSIS OF THIS SURGERY WAS CERVICAL SPONDYLOTIC MYELOPATHY. THE LEVEL AT WHICH THE IMPLANT WAS PERFORMED: C3/6. THERE WAS A DELAY OF LESS THAN 60 MINUTES. THERE WAS NO PATIENT SYMPTOM IN THE EVENT AND NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS/SYMPTOMS WERE REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED FROM THE MANUFACTURER REPRESENTATIVE THAT THE THERE IS A POSSIBILITY THAT THE METAL FRAGMENT IS PART OF THE DRIVER. WHEN ATTACHED TO THE SCREW DRIVER AND CARRIED TO THE SURGICAL FIELD, A PIECE OF METAL WAS ATTACHED TO THE IMPLANT SCREW HEAD ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE SCREWDRIVER. THEREFORE, IT WAS NOT USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21340132 ↗
Other SCREWDRIVER devices
- DELTA XTEND 2307-92-003Depuy (Ireland) · SCREWDRIVER751 reports
- EXPEDIUM 279712400Medos International Sàrl · SCREWDRIVER551 reports
- NA 314.467Synthes GmbH · SCREWDRIVER498 reports
- N/A 5584111Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · SCREWDRIVER492 reports
- QUICKSET 2274-47-000Depuy (Ireland) · SCREWDRIVER487 reports
- NA 03.130.010Synthes GmbH · SCREWDRIVER1 recall422 reports
- QUICKSET 2274-63-000Depuy (Ireland) · SCREWDRIVER404 reports
- EVOS 71175072Smith & Nephew, Inc. · SCREWDRIVER336 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page