ORTHOMATCH 71442109Recalls & reported problems
Smith & Nephew, Inc. · ORTHOMATCH UNIVERSAL PRIMARY CUTTING BLOCK · Class 2
All models of ORTHOMATCH (10)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00885556494356), received between Dec 6, 2017 and Dec 18, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break4
- Material Deformation2
- Connection Problem1
- Degraded1
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
- Material Integrity Problem1
- Mechanical Problem1
- Naturally Worn1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient3
- Injury1
- Laceration(s)1
- No Code Available1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 18, 2025Material Deformation; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TKA SURGERY, THE CUTTING BLOCK HAD A SPACE WHERE THE SAW PASSES THAT WAS TOO LARGE, MAKING A PERFECT CUT DIFFICULT. A RISK OF INJURY TO THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED, AS THE EXCESSIVE OPENING COULD HAVE CAUSED AN IMPERFECT CUT. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING THE SAME DEVICE. PATIENT WAS NOT HARMED AS CONSEQUENCE OF THIS PROBLEM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23843504 ↗MalfunctionSep 27, 2024Degraded; Material Deformation; Degraded; Material Deformation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A TKA SURGERY, THE ORTHOMATCH UNIVERSAL CUT BLOCK HAD VERY OPEN CUTTING SPACES AND CAUSED THE DISTAL CUT TO BE MADE TOO POSTERIOR AND WHEN USED, THE BLOCK LOST ITS REFERENCE. THE PROCEDURE WAS RESUMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, USING THE SAME DEVICE. NO FURTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED AS CONSEQUENCE OF THIS PROBLEM.
Patient problems: Laceration(s)
MAUDE report 20323417 ↗MalfunctionNov 27, 2023Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING USE, A ORTHOMATCH UNIVERSAL CUT BLOCK WAS NOTICED TO BE BROKEN. SURGERY WAS PERFORMED, WITHOUT ANY DELAY, WITH THE SAME DEVICE. NO PATIENT HARM WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 18210153 ↗MalfunctionNov 10, 2022Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A TKA SURGERY, A ORTHOMATCH UNIVERSAL CUT BLOCK BROKE. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH A SMITH AND NEPHEW BACK UP DEVICE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THERE WAS A DELAY AS CONSEQUENCE OF THE ISSUE OR IF ANY PIECE FELL INSIDE THE PATIENT. NO INJURIES TO THE PATIENT WERE REPORTED. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15777468 ↗MalfunctionMar 25, 2021Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE ORTHOMATCH UNIVERSAL CUT BLOCK PRESENTED AN EXCESSIVE WEAR AND DID NOT CUT PROPERLY. NO CASE REPORTED; THEREFORE, THERE WAS NO PATIENT INVOLVEMENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 11572407 ↗InjuryJul 23, 2020Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING ARTHROSCOPY THE DEVICE WAS BROKE INSIDE THE PATIENT. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT DELAY. IT IS UNKNOWN HOW THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED. PATIENT OUTCOME IS UNKNOWN. ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN DISCLOSED. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE, A SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT WILL BE SUBMITTED ACCORDINGLY.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10317783 ↗MalfunctionJun 24, 2019Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT CUT BLOCKS BROKE WHILE BEING USED DURING SURGERY. NO DELAY OR INJURY REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8727641 ↗MalfunctionJul 24, 2018Connection Problem; Connection Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A MALFUNCTION HAS OCCURED IN WHERE THE CUTTING BLOCK DETACHES FROM THE ATTACHMENT AND WAS NOT HOLDING FIRMLY, IT WAS VERY LOOSE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7715971 ↗InjuryJul 23, 2018Mechanical Problem; Mechanical Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INSTRUMENT WAS NOT HOLDING FIRMLY TO 3' CONNECTOR AND IT KEPT FALLING OFF INCREASING THEATRE TIME AND CAUSING INAPPROPRIATE TIBIAL CUTS. SURGEON FINISHED SURGERY USING COMPETITOR'S DEVICE.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7712112 ↗InjuryJun 9, 2018Loose or Intermittent Connection; Loose or Intermittent Connection
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DEVICE DIDN'T ATTACH FIRMLY TO THE TIBIAL 3¿ CONNECTOR, WHEN CUTTING THE PROXIMAL TIBIAL CUTS THE CUTS WERE NOT HORIZONTAL, WHEN THE SURGEON PUT THE TRIAL TIBIAL IMPLANT AND INSERT, THE PATELLA WAS NOT TRACKING WELL, UPON RECHECKING ON THE CUTS, IT WAS NOTICED THE CUT WASN¿T PARALLEL DUE TO LOOSENING OF THE BLOCK.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 7585363 ↗MalfunctionDec 6, 2017Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT EVEN THOUGH THE ORTHOMATCH UNIVERSAL PRIMARY CUTTING BLOCK WAS ATTACHED FIRMLY THE ALIGNMENT WAS INCORRECT RESULTING IN A VALGUS DETERMINATION ON THE FEMORAL CUTS AND POOR INCLINATION ON THE TIBIAL CUTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7088664 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page