Skip to content

OR3O Dual Mobility 71358213Recalls & reported problems

Smith & Nephew, Inc. · OR3O DUAL MOBILITY XLPE INSERT 22/36 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of OR3O Dual Mobility (30)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00885556712337), received between Jul 10, 2020 and Jun 17, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 2 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Joint Dislocation2
  • Foreign Body Reaction1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJun 17, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A RIGHT HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020 IN WHICH SMITH & NEPHEW WERE IMPLANTED (INSERT ACETABULAR OR3O XLPE OD 36 MM ID22 MM 2 MOBILITY, LINER ACETABULAR OR3O OD 48 MM ID36 MM 2 MOBILITY AND SHELL REDAPT MOD 48MM) WITH A COMPETITOR FEMORAL HEAD (STRYKER); PATIENT SUSTAINED A DISLOCATION OF THE INTERNAL RIGHT HIP PROSTHESIS THAT REQUIRED RE-REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. CURRENT PATIENT'S HEALTH STATUS IS UNKNOWN. NO OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 19554077 ↗
  • InjuryJun 17, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A LEFT HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020 IN WHICH SMITH & NEPHEW WERE IMPLANTED; PATIENT SUSTAINED A DISLOCATION OF THE INTERNAL LEFT HIP PROSTHESIS THAT REQUIRED RE-REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. CURRENT PATIENT'S HEALTH STATUS IS UNKNOWN. NO OTHER COMPLICATIONS WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 19553125 ↗
  • InjuryJul 10, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS TAKEN OUT DUE TO AN UNKNOWN ADVERSE TISSUE REACTION. PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH A COMPETITOR DEVICE.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction

    MAUDE report 10261032 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page