Skip to content

C/IS-10 SS2Recalls & reported problems

Oscor Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00885672102739), received between Jun 12, 2017 and May 22, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Impedance Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Impedance Problem1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Over-Sensing1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Unspecified Infection2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMay 22, 2024Over-Sensing; Over-Sensing

    THE CUSTOMER REOPENED THIS COMPLAINT FROM A VINTAGE SYSTEM; REPORTED EVENT DATE IS 2014-10-14. THE CUSTOMER RECEIVED INFORMATION THAT THIS PATIENT EXHIBITED SOME MYOPOTENTIALS IN BOTH THE RIGHT ATRIAL (RA) LEAD AND RIGHT VENTRICULAR (RV) LEADS. THE RA LEAD IS BELIEVED TO BE A NON-BOSTON SCIENTIFIC LEAD. WE HAVE NO INFORMATION REGARDING THE LEAD. OUR DEVICE IS L331/972384. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC TECHNICAL SERVICES (TS) WAS CONSULTED AND STATED THAT SINCE THIS IS A PACEMAKER DEPENDENT PATIENT, THEY CAN RAISE THE SENSING TO 10 TO ELIMINATE THE ISSUE, THEY MIGHT STILL SEE SOME OVERSENSING. THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP) ELECTED TO LEAVE AT A SETTING OF 1.5 TO ELIMINATE OVERSENSING ON THE ATRIAL LEAD, BUT STILL WANTED TO SEE P-WAVES. TS STATED THIS IS NORMAL OPERATION FOR THESE UNIPOLAR LEADS. CURRENTLY BOTH LEADS REMAIN IMPLANTED. THE ONLY INFORMATION WE HAVE REGARDING THESE LEADS ARE THE ADAPTERS LISTED. TO DATE, NO ADVERSE PATIENT EFFECTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED INDICATES THAT THE RA LEAD WITH THIS ADAPTER EXHIBITED OVERSENSING OF MYOPOTENTIAL NOISY SIGNALS THAT RESULTED IN INAPPROPRIATE MODE SWITCHES AND PACING INHIBITION. THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL (HCP

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19375275 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2018Impedance Problem; Impedance Problem

    REPORTER RECEIVED A CALL ON (B)(6) 2018, THAT INDICATED THE MALE PATIENT, (B)(6) WAS IN CLINIC AND BROUGHT THEIR COMMUNICATOR, WHICH DISPLAYED A RED CALL DOCTOR ICON. PATIENT SERVICES ASSISTED THE HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL WITH SUCCESSFULLY CONNECTING THE COMMUNICATOR TO THE SERVER. A RED ALERT POSTED FOR OUT OF RANGE RV PACING IMPEDANCE MEASUREMENTS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED HOWEVER AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE REGARDING THE PRODUCT NOR THE INCIDENT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7439537 ↗
  • InjuryOct 20, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THIS ADAPTER WAS EXPLANTED (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6964520 ↗
  • InjuryOct 20, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    EVENT DESCRIPTION: 479-01/(B)(4)- INFECTION - EXPLANTED; 493-04/(B)(4) - INFECTION - EXPLANTED; C/IS/(B)(4) - INFECTION - EXPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6964510 ↗
  • InjuryJun 12, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE BRADY ADAPTER WAS EXPLANTED DUE TO AN UNKNOWN PRODUCT PERFORMANCE ISSUE.

    Patient problems: No Information; No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 6635004 ↗

Other Pacemaker Lead Adaptor devices

All Pacemaker Lead Adaptor devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.