SR PIP SR PIP-3Recalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · Proximal Interphalangeal Implant, Size 3 · Class f · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00886385020334), received between Aug 15, 2019 and Jun 18, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Missing” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Component Missing1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Migration1
Patient problems
- Implant Pain1
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Dislocation1
- Joint Laxity1
- No Code Available1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 18, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated
InjuryJan 9, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
InjuryJul 29, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
InjuryJun 3, 2022Migration; Migration
AS REPORTED: "SIZE 3 PIP PROXIMAL IMPLANT MIGRATED VOLAR IMPLANT HAD BEEN ORIGINALLY IMPLANTED WITHIN THE LAST 3-4 YEARS. ONLY THE PROXIMAL COMPONENT NEEDS TO BE REVISED. IT WAS INSPECTED IN THE OR AND APPEARED TO BE IN GOOD WORKING ORDER WITHOUT ISSUES."
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14585242 ↗MalfunctionAug 15, 2019Component Missing
THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT A STRYKER SBI LOAN KIT ARRIVED AT THE HOSPITAL MISSING AN IMPLANT. THE PATIENT HAD ALREADY BEEN ANAESTHETIZED BEFORE THE SURGEON REALIZED. ONCE HE REALIZED, THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO OBTAIN AN IMPLANT FROM (ANOTHER SITE) IN ORDER TO RUN THE CASE. THIS WAS NOT POSSIBLE. THE PATIENT WAS KEPT UNDER ANESTHETIC FOR 1.5 HOURS AND THEN THE CASE WAS ABANDONED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 8898405 ↗
Other Semi-Constrained Metal/Polymer Finger Joint Prosthesis devices
- SR MCP 5800-MD00Stryker GmbH · Semi-Constrained Metal/Polymer Finger Joint Prosthesis5 reports
- SR PIP 17-1325Stryker GmbH · Semi-Constrained Metal/Polymer Finger Joint Prosthesis3 reports
- SR MCP 5800-LG00Stryker GmbH · Semi-Constrained Metal/Polymer Finger Joint Prosthesis3 reports
- SR MCP 5800-XL00Stryker GmbH · Semi-Constrained Metal/Polymer Finger Joint Prosthesis2 reports
- SR PIP SR PIP-1Stryker GmbH · Semi-Constrained Metal/Polymer Finger Joint Prosthesis2 reports
- SR PIP SR PIP-4Stryker GmbH · Semi-Constrained Metal/Polymer Finger Joint Prosthesis2 reports
- SR PIP 17-1327Stryker GmbH · Semi-Constrained Metal/Polymer Finger Joint Prosthesis2 reports
- SR PIP SR PIP-2Stryker GmbH · Semi-Constrained Metal/Polymer Finger Joint Prosthesis2 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page