Skip to content

NA MCP-20Recalls & reported problems

Stryker GmbH · Silicone II MCP Implant Size 20 · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00886385022116), received between Apr 27, 2021 and Feb 25, 2025 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 2 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break1
  • Fracture1
  • Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
  • Material Invagination1
  • Naturally Worn1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information5
  • Failure of Implant3
  • Implant Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO UNKNOWN REASON.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21465305 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 25, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO UNKNOWN REASON.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 21465302 ↗
  • InjuryJul 12, 2022Break; Fracture; Break; Fracture

    AS REPORTED: "PATIENT HAD INITIAL SURGERY (B)(6) 2019. STARTED TO EXPERIENCE SOME PAIN RECENTLY AND SURGEON DETERMINED THAT HER IMPLANT HAD FRACTURED AND BROUGHT HER IN FOR A REVISION. REVISION WAS DONE (B)(6) 2022 AND A MCP-X 20 WAS IMPLANTED".

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Implant Pain

    MAUDE report 14985165 ↗
  • InjuryJun 6, 2022Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE INITIAL IMPLANTED DEVICE WAS TOO SMALL AND DISLOCATED. SURGEON IMPLANTED A LARGER IMPLANT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 14604877 ↗
  • InjuryNov 11, 2021Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THE IMPLANTS WERE WORN, REQUIRING REVISION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 12793170 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THE DEVICE WAS LOOSE, REQUIRING REVISION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11885449 ↗
  • InjuryMay 26, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THE DEVICE WAS LOOSE, REQUIRING REVISION SURGERY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11885443 ↗
  • InjuryApr 27, 2021Material Invagination; Material Invagination

    AS REPORTED: "TAKEN OUT OLD IMPLANTS PUTTING IN NEW ONES. PATIENT HAD FUSED WRIST IMPLANTS, HAD COLLAPSED OVER TIME. HAD TO BE TAKEN OUT IN PIECES".

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11735103 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page