NA MCPX-50Recalls & reported problems
Stryker GmbH · MCP PreFlex Implant Size 50 · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00886385025391), received between Nov 3, 2020 and Nov 11, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Patient Device Interaction Problem1
Patient problems
- Failure of Implant2
- Deformity/ Disfigurement1
- Joint Laxity1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryNov 11, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
COMPLAINT - NOT SURE IF IT WAS FLEX OR STRAIGHT AND DOCTOR THINKS IT WAS SIZE 50. IT WAS PUT IN BY ANOTHER DOCTOR BUT THE IMPLANT WAS BROKEN WHEN REMOVED FROM THIS PATIENT.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 23528609 ↗InjurySep 6, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION TOOK PLACE DUE TO RECURRENCE OF DEFORMITY.
Patient problems: Deformity/ Disfigurement
MAUDE report 15360744 ↗InjuryFeb 14, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED: "THE IMPLANT HAD CAME OUT DISTALLY FROM THE FLANGE CANAL. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED."
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 13523232 ↗InjuryNov 3, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE MANUFACTURER BECAME AWARE OF A POST MARKET CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP REPORT RECEIVED FROM (B)(6), IN FRANCE. THE TITLE OF THIS REPORT IS ¿A RETROSPECTIVE DATA COLLECTION OF THE TREATMENT OF DEGENERATIVE OR POST-TRAUMATIC DISABILITIES IN THE METACARPOPHALANGEAL (MCP) AND PROXIMAL INTERPHALANGEAL (PIP) JOINTS WITH THE SILICONE AND PREFLEX PROSTHESES¿ WHICH IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE STRYKER ¿SILICONE PIP AND PREFLEX MCP¿ PROSTHESIS. THIS STUDY INCLUDES RESEARCH DONE ON 109 PATIENTS (142 IMPLANTS) REQUIRING SURGERY BETWEEN THE PERIOD 2007 AND 2019. IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ASCERTAIN SPECIFIC DEVICE DETAILS FROM THE REPORT, OR TO MATCH THE EVENTS REPORTED WITH PREVIOUSLY REPORTED COMPLAINTS. THEREFORE, NEW COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED IN THE SYSTEM FOR THE POST-OPERATIVE COMPLICATION MENTIONED IN THE REPORT. THIS PRODUCT INQUIRY ADDRESSES BAD JOINT STABILITY AND ULNAR OFF-AXIS.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 10779168 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER devices
- Osteotec Silicone Finger Implant - Size 4 OSTF-4Osteotec Limited · Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer1 recall1 report
- Osteotec Silicone Finger Implant - Size 3 OSTF-3Osteotec Limited · Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer1 recall0 reports
- Osteotec Silicone Finger Implant - Size 5 OSTF-5Osteotec Limited · Prosthesis, Finger, Constrained, Polymer1 recall0 reports
- NA PIP-30Stryker GmbH · PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER27 reports
- NA PIP-20Stryker GmbH · PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER21 reports
- NA PIP-10Stryker GmbH · PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER16 reports
- NA MCP-30Stryker GmbH · PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER16 reports
- NA MCP-50Stryker GmbH · PROSTHESIS, FINGER, CONSTRAINED, POLYMER14 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page