CoRoent 7151055Recalls & reported problems
Nuvasive, Inc. · CoRoent XLW 15°, 10x22x55mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of CoRoent (64)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887517231703), received between Apr 20, 2017 and Mar 3, 2021 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Failure to Osseointegrate” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Failure to Osseointegrate1
- Migration1
- Migration or Expulsion of Device1
Patient problems
- Pain2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 3, 2021Migration; Migration
ON A UNKNOWN DATE IN (B)(6) 2020 A FEMALE PATIENT UNDERWENT A EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION PROCEDURE AT L4-L5. THE PATIENT BEGAN TO EXPERIENCE PAIN POST-OP AND ON A UNKNOWN DATE IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT THE IMPLANTED CAGE HAD MIGRATED ANTERIORLY. ON (B)(6) 2020 A REVISION OCCURRED WHERE THE MIGRATED IMPLANT WAS REMOVED AND REPOSITIONED. IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENTS PAIN HAS IMPROVED POST REVISION.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 11407540 ↗MalfunctionApr 20, 2017Migration or Expulsion of Device; Failure to Osseointegrate; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Failure to Osseointegrate
PATIENT UNDERWENT A LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION PROCEDURE AT L3-4 ON (B)(6) 2016. A PEEK INTERBODY CAGE WAS IMPLANTED WITH ADDITIONAL FIXATION HARDWARE. IN ADDITION, A BONE GRAFT WAS PLACED INSIDE THE CAGE AND IN THE POSTERIOR LATERAL GUTTERS. ONE YEAR AFTER INDEX SURGERY, RADIOGRAPHS INDICATED L3-4 HAD NOT FUSED AND THE CAGE MIGRATED ANTERIORLY. THE PATIENT REPORTED SEVERE PAIN. NO INJURY WAS REPORTED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 6509947 ↗
Other Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page