ReLine 10000425Recalls & reported problems
Nuvasive, Inc. · RELINE MAS Tap, 4.5mm Cannulated · Class 2
All models of ReLine (129)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887517511225), received between Aug 27, 2020 and May 8, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 6 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (6 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture6
- Failure to Cut1
Patient problems
- Foreign Body In Patient5
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Paralysis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 8, 2025Fracture; Fracture
THREADED PART OF THE 4.5MM TAP BROKE OFF AND WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT¿S RIGHT L2 VERTEBRAL BODY/PEDICLE AFTER UNSUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVING. BREAKAGE OCCURRED WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE TAP FROM THE BONE.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 21989619 ↗MalfunctionMar 7, 2025Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION WITH POSTERIOR FIXATION, WHEN TAPPING THE PATIENT'S RIGHT L2 VERTEBRA, THE THREADED PART OF THE TAP BROKE OFF AND WAS RETAINED IN THE PATIENT'S BONE. NO FURTHER PATIENT IMPACT WAS REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 21548464 ↗MalfunctionMay 3, 2024Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE WHILE THE SURGEON WAS TAPPING, THE DISTAL TIP OF THE TAP FRACTURED. THE FRACTURED PORTION WAS UNABLE TO BE RETRIEVED AND WAS LEFT IN-SITU. NO FURTHER PATIENT IMPACT WAS REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 19244070 ↗MalfunctionApr 21, 2023Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A SIX (6) LEVEL POSTERIOR FIXATION PROCEDURE FROM T12 TO S1. DURING THE PROCEDURE THE TIP OF THE CANNULATED TAP FRACTURED AT THE LEFT L2 PEDICLE. THE FRACTURED PORTION WAS UNABLE TO BE RETRIEVED AND WAS LEFT IN-SITU. THE PATIENT'S BONE QUALITY WAS NOTED TO BE VERY HARD. AS A RESULT, THE SURGEON DECIDED TO SKIP FIXATION OF THE LEFT L2 PEDICLE AS A SCREW WAS UNABLE TO BE IMPLANTED INTO THE SITE. NO FURTHER PATIENT IMPACT WAS REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 16792237 ↗InjuryOct 14, 2022Failure to Cut; Failure to Cut
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL POSTERIOR FIXATION PROCEDURE FROM T9 TO L3. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE SURGEON EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTIES WITH TAPPING THE PILOT HOLE AT THE L1 PEDICLE. MULTIPLE ATTEMPTS WERE MADE, BUT WERE UNSUCCESSFUL IN CREATING THE PILOT HOLE. THE SURGEON OPTED TO SKIP THE L1 LEVEL AND CONTINUE THE PROCEDURE AT THE REMAINING LEVELS. THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED WITH NO FURTHER ISSUES. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PARALYSIS OF THE LEFT LEG POSTOPERATIVELY. CT AND MRI IMAGING WAS OBTAINED TO IDENTIFY THE CAUSE OF THE PARALYSIS, BUT NO FINDINGS WERE IDENTIFIED. THE SURGEON IS CONTINUING TO FOLLOW-UP WITH THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER PATIENT IMPACT WAS REPORTED. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Paralysis
MAUDE report 15611474 ↗MalfunctionJul 11, 2022Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN EIGHT (8) LEVEL POSTERIOR FIXATION PROCEDURE FROM T10 TO S1. DURING THE PROCEDURE, AS THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO TAP THE LEFT L4 PEDICLE, THE TIP OF THE CANNULATED TAP FRACTURED. THE FRACTURED PORTION WAS UNABLE TO BE RETRIEVED. NO FURTHER PATIENT IMPACT WAS REPORTED. THE PATIENT'S BONE QUALITY WAS NOTED TO BE VERY HARD.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 14983055 ↗MalfunctionAug 27, 2020Fracture; Fracture
ON (B)(6) 2020, PATIENT UNDERWENT A TWO PART PROCEDURE. FIRST AN EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION AT L2/3 LEVELS AND SECOND, SAME DAY A PERCUTANEOUS POSTERIOR FIXATION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT A TAP DRIVER FRACTURED WHEN A PHYSICIAN WAS INSERTING IT AT THE L4 LEVEL. THE PHYSICIAN TRIED TO REMOVE THE PIECE, HOWEVER HE COULD NOT RETRIEVE IT. THE PHYSICIAN CHANGED THE PROCEDURE FROM THE PERCUTANEOUS PEDICLE SCREW TO AN OPEN PROCEDURE WHERE THE PIECE WAS REMOVED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10462657 ↗
Other STIMULATOR, NERVE devices
- NIM Vital NIM4CM01Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE2 recalls260 reports
- NIM TriVantage® 8229707Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE2 recalls176 reports
- NIM® 8229306Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE1 recall1 death167 reports
- NIM Vital™ NIM4CPB1Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE3 recalls45 reports
- NIM Trivantage® 8229707Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE1 recall142 reports
- NIM® 8229307Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE1 recall138 reports
- NIM TriVantage® 8229706Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE2 recalls78 reports
- NIM-Response® 8253002Medtronic Xomed, Inc. · STIMULATOR, NERVE171 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page