Skip to content

ReLine 16016545Recalls & reported problems

Nuvasive, Inc. · RELINE MAS Screw, 6.5x45mm 2C Polyaxial · Class 2 · Implant

All models of ReLine (129)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887517553584), received between Oct 1, 2018 and Feb 14, 2024 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2
  • Vertebral Fracture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 14, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2023 AN EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION WAS PERFORMED AT L1/5. T10/S2 WAS FIXATED WITH POSTERIOR FIAXTION. POST-OPERATIVELY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE A VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE OCCURRED AT T10 AND PARALYSIS DEVELOPED. ON (B)(6) 2024 A REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED TO EXTEND THE FIXATION TO T7. THE SURGEON NOTED THERE WAS A CORRELATION BETWEEN THE VERTEBRAL FRACTURE AND PATIENT'S POOR BONE QUALITY.

    Patient problems: Vertebral Fracture

    MAUDE report 18707281 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 25, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    SEE UPDATED INFORMATION IN H10.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 10198225 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 1, 2018Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Migration

    ON (B)(6) 2018, PATIENT WITH A FRACTURED L1 UNDERWENT A POSTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION AT L2/L3 LEVELS WITH POSTERIOR FIXATION FROM T10-L3. A LOOSE SCREW AT L3 AND A CAGE BACK OUT WAS IDENTIFIED POST-OPERATIVE. ON (B)(6) 2018 A REVISION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED TO REPLACE THE L3 LEVEL SCREW AND THE CAGE. CONSTRUCT WAS ALSO EXTENDED FROM T10 TO S2 AND A CROSS CONNECTOR WAS ADDED. NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 7924634 ↗

Other ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices

All ORTHOSIS, SPINAL PEDICLE FIXATION devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page