BIOLOX® delta Modular Ceramic Head 650-1158Recalls & reported problems
Biomet Uk Ltd · Class 2 · Implant
All models of BIOLOX delta Modular Ceramic Head (10)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 16
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 12
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 16 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887868271526), received between Sep 28, 2021 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 12 injuries, 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem7
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated4
- Fracture3
- Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem1
- Break1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Material Integrity Problem1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation4
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Pain4
- Bone Fracture(s)2
- Failure of Implant2
- Fall2
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Impingement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 16 most recent of 16 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 15, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 23279914 ↗InjuryAug 28, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY ON AN UNKNOWN DATE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO PAIN. NO OTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 22912222 ↗InjuryAug 11, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information; Medical device site infection
MAUDE report 22772249 ↗InjuryJul 15, 2025Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY FOUR YEARS POST-IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A HIP REVISION DUE TO DISLOCATION OF THE LINER AND BEARING. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED A MANUAL REDUCTION OF THE DISLOCATION AND THEN THE BEARING AND HEAD SEPARATED. ALL COMPONENTS REVISED EXCEPT THE STEM. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 22505378 ↗InjuryJun 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO YEARS POST AN INITIAL LEFT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED THE PATIENT REPORTED ONGOING MODERATE LOW BACK PAIN THAT WAS NOT PRESENT PRIOR TO THE INITIAL PROCEDURE. IT WAS INITIALLY THOUGHT TO BE GENERAL POSTOP SORENESS; HOWEVER, THE PAIN HAS NOT RESOLVED AND CONTINUES TO LIMIT ACTIVITIES. THE PATIENT HAS SINCE WITHDRAWN FROM THE STUDY TO FOCUS ON THERAPY FOR THE LOW BACK PAIN. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 22272224 ↗InjuryJan 9, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD A HIP REPLACEMENT ON UNKNOWN DATE. SUBSEQUENTLY, UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO PAIN/IMPINGEMENT. CERAMIC HEAD WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. DILIGENCE IS COMPLETED AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Joint Impingement; Pain
MAUDE report 21112101 ↗MalfunctionDec 26, 2024Fracture; Fracture
DILIGENCE IS COMPLETED AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21020815 ↗InjurySep 19, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Joint Dislocation; Metal Related Pathology; Pain; Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 20254751 ↗MalfunctionAug 22, 2024Fracture; Fracture
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20027830 ↗InjuryJun 10, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH POST IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION DUE TO GREATER TROCHANTERIC FRACTURE. DUE DILIGENCE IS IN PROGRESS FOR THIS COMPLAINT; TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR PRODUCT HAS BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 19497215 ↗InjuryJan 31, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT HAD A FALL AND FRACTURED THEIR FEMUR. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS POST INITIAL IMPLANTATION. NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Fall
MAUDE report 18612834 ↗InjuryJun 1, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION AFTER A FALL APPROXIMATELY 2 MONTHS POST IMPLANTATION. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Fall; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 14559977 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
07 APR 2022 UPDATE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT: INITIAL RIGHT HIP HEMIARTHROPLASTY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018 IN AN (B)(6) MALE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO A DEEP INFECTION ON (B)(6) 2018. ON 02-MAR-2022, A JOURNAL ARTICLE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2021) THAT REPORTED A STUDY FROM JAPAN THAT LOOKED AT THE IMPACT OF THE SURGICAL APPROACH ON POSTOPERATIVE DISLOCATIONS. THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY WAS TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF HEMIARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED USING THE CPP (CONJOINED TENDON PRESERVING POSTERIOR) APPROACH FOR FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES. THE STUDY REVIEWED 322 PATIENTS WITH FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES. A BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY WAS PERFORMED IN ALL PATIENTS USING A PRESS-FIT TAPERLOC STEM AND RINGLOC BIPOLAR CUP. TWO PATIENTS WERE EXCLUDED FROM THE STUDY DUE TO RECEIVING A TOTAL HIP AT THE TIME OF SURGERY, LEAVING 320 PATIENTS FOR FINAL REVIEW. NO PATIENTS WERE EXCLUDED BASED ON AGE, FRAILTY, OR COGNITIVE STATUS. THE STUDY POPULATION HAD A MEAN AGE OF 83.3 YEARS AT THE TIME OF SURGERY (RANGE 57-104) AND A MEAN BMI OF 20.7 (RANGE 11.4-28.9). THE FINAL FOLLOW-UP WAS CONDUCTED AT 9.1 +/- 1.5 MONTHS AFTER SURGERY (RANGE 6-17 MONTHS). C
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 14140283 ↗MalfunctionJan 19, 2022Mechanical Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Mechanical Problem; Physical Resistance/Sticking
IT WAS REPORTED, THAT THE HEAD WAS STUCK HARD IN THE E1 LINER. DELAY: 0-15 MINUTES, IT TOOK A FEW MINUTES TO REPLACE THE SAME PRODUCT. PATIENT OUTCOME: PROLONGED SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13287974 ↗MalfunctionNov 24, 2021Difficult to Insert; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Positioning Problem; Difficult to Insert; Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem; Positioning Problem
IT WAS REPORTED, THAT: DELTA CERAMIC HEAD INTO THE E1 BIPOLAR LINER, BUT THE CERAMIC HEAD DID NOT MOVE IN THE E1 BIPOLAR LINER. I WANT TO KNOW WHAT IS HAPPENED FOR THESE ISSUE. PATIENT OUTCOME: PROLONGED SURGERY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12868879 ↗InjurySep 28, 2021Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED, THAT: DUAL MOBILITY BEARING WAS ASSEMBLY OFF TABLE. CONSTRUCT WAS STABLE AND HEAD WAS MOVING FREELY INSIDE BEARING. THIS CONSTRUCT WAS THEN BROUGHT OVER TO THE PATIENT TO ASSEMBLY ON TRUNION OF STEM. CONSTRUCT WAS PLACED ON TRUNION AND IMPACTED TO ENGAGE, AFTER IMPACTING AND TESTING THE JUNCTION FOR STABILITY THE SURGEON NOTICED THE WHOLE CONSTRUCT CAME OFF, AND A SMALL PIECE OF THE CERAMIC HEAD HAS BEEN CHIPPED OFF. NO CERAMIC PIECES LANDED IN THE PATIENT. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT. ADDI 23 DEC 2021 HOSPITAL DETAILS: (B)(6) HOSPITAL, (B)(6). NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARE AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 12539146 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page