BIOLOX® delta Modular Ceramic Head 650-1159Recalls & reported problems
Biomet Uk Ltd · Class 2 · Implant
All models of BIOLOX delta Modular Ceramic Head (10)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 22
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 20
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 22 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00887868271533), received between Aug 20, 2021 and Dec 3, 2025 — classified as 20 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (7 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem9
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated7
- Mechanical Problem3
- Unintended Movement3
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Fracture1
- Malposition of Device1
Patient problems
- Joint Dislocation8
- Failure of Implant4
- Pain3
- Insufficient Information2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Unequal Limb Length2
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Joint Impingement1
Recent adverse event reports
The 22 most recent of 22 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 3, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A PRIMARY TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT AND SUBSEQUENTLY DEVELOPED ONGOING PAIN DURING HIP FLEXION AND EXTERNAL ROTATION, WITH SUSPECTED ILIOPSOAS INVOLVEMENT/IMPINGEMENT. THE PATIENT¿S JOINT WAS LATER REOPENED, AND A SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED APPROXIMATELY 19 MONTHS POST-IMPLANTATION. DETAILS REGARDING SPECIFIC COMPONENT CHANGES OR INTRA-OPERATIVE FINDINGS WERE NOT PROVIDED. NO ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS WERE REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS REVISED; NO FURTHER DETAILS REGARDING THE PATIENT¿S OUTCOME WERE PROVIDED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE, AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 23704860 ↗InjuryOct 16, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 23311572 ↗InjuryAug 28, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Unequal Limb Length
MAUDE report 22913075 ↗InjuryAug 11, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 22772245 ↗InjuryMay 19, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT HIP REVISION DUE TO A DISLOCATION LIMITED SOLELY TO THE FEMORAL HEAD, APPROXIMATELY 18 DAYS POST-IMPLANTATION. DUE DILIGENCE IS IN PROGRESS FOR THIS EVENT; TO DATE NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 22042394 ↗InjuryOct 9, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 20406318 ↗InjuryAug 20, 2024Noise, Audible; Noise, Audible
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Failure of Implant; Pain
MAUDE report 20004066 ↗InjuryMay 23, 2024Malposition of Device; Malposition of Device
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL HIP PROCEDURE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY ONE YEAR LATER DUE TO JOINT IMPINGEMENT. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Joint Impingement
MAUDE report 19379766 ↗MalfunctionAug 7, 2023Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17469353 ↗InjuryJul 28, 2023Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Joint Dislocation; Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 17413293 ↗InjuryJul 10, 2023Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL RIGHT TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO HIP FRACTURE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A DISLOCATION DUE TO UNKNOWN REASONS AND WAS REDUCED IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT. LATER ON, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A HEAD AND LINER EXCHANGE DUE TO AN INTRA-PROSTHETIC DISLOCATION (DISASSOCIATION) WHILE BENDING. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 17286763 ↗InjuryJun 27, 2023Fracture; Fracture
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE DUE TO CERAMIC HEAD FRACTURE, 3 DAYS AFTER THE INITIAL SURGERY. DUE DILIGENCE IS IN PROGRESS FOR THIS COMPLAINT; TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR PRODUCT HAS BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 17206980 ↗InjuryMay 30, 2023Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 17018155 ↗InjuryMar 10, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION 10 DAYS POST HIP ARTHROPLASTY DUE TO LEG LENGTH DISCREPANCY. THE ORIGINAL STEM WAS INSERTED FURTHER, AND THE HEAD WAS EXCHANGED. DUE DILIGENCE IS IN PROGRESS FOR THIS COMPLAINT; TO DATE NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OR PRODUCT HAS BEEN RECEIVED.
Patient problems: Unequal Limb Length
MAUDE report 16521121 ↗InjuryMay 7, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED, THAT: ON 02-MAR-2022, A JOURNAL ARTICLE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2021) THAT REPORTED A STUDY FROM JAPAN THAT LOOKED AT THE IMPACT OF THE SURGICAL APPROACH ON POSTOPERATIVE DISLOCATIONS. THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY WAS TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF HEMIARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED USING THE CPP (CONJOINED TENDON PRESERVING POSTERIOR) APPROACH FOR FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES. THE STUDY REVIEWED 322 PATIENTS WITH FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES. A BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY WAS PERFORMED IN ALL PATIENTS USING A PRESS-FIT TAPERLOC STEM AND RINGLOC BIPOLAR CUP. TWO PATIENTS WERE EXCLUDED FROM THE STUDY DUE TO RECEIVING A TOTAL HIP AT THE TIME OF SURGERY, LEAVING 320 PATIENTS FOR FINAL REVIEW. NO PATIENTS WERE EXCLUDED BASED ON AGE, FRAILTY, OR COGNITIVE STATUS. THE STUDY POPULATION HAD A MEAN AGE OF 83.3 YEARS AT THE TIME OF SURGERY (RANGE 57-104) AND A MEAN BMI OF 20.7 (RANGE 11.4-28.9). THE FINAL FOLLOW-UP WAS CONDUCTED AT 9.1 +/- 1.5 MONTHS AFTER SURGERY (RANGE 6-17 MONTHS). COMPLAINT 7: THE STUDY REPORTED AN INITIAL RIGHT HIP HEMIARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2018 ON A (B)(6) FEMALE. AFTER CLOSING THE WOUND DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT
Patient problems: Pulmonary Embolism
MAUDE report 14315851 ↗InjuryApr 20, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
07 APR 2022 UPDATE: INITIAL RIGHT HIP HEMIARTHROPLASTY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2017 IN AN (B)(6) MALE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A SUPERFICIAL INFECTION. THE EVENT WAS NOTED TO HAVE BEEN RESOLVED. NO DETAILS CONCERNING TREATMENT OR INTERVENTION WERE PROVIDED. ON 02-MAR-2022, A JOURNAL ARTICLE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2021) THAT REPORTED A STUDY FROM (B)(6) THAT LOOKED AT THE IMPACT OF THE SURGICAL APPROACH ON POSTOPERATIVE DISLOCATIONS. THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY WAS TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF HEMIARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED USING THE CPP (CONJOINED TENDON PRESERVING POSTERIOR) APPROACH FOR FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES. THE STUDY REVIEWED 322 PATIENTS WITH FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES. A BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY WAS PERFORMED IN ALL PATIENTS USING A PRESS-FIT TAPERLOC STEM AND RINGLOC BIPOLAR CUP. TWO PATIENTS WERE EXCLUDED FROM THE STUDY DUE TO RECEIVING A TOTAL HIP AT THE TIME OF SURGERY, LEAVING 320 PATIENTS FOR FINAL REVIEW. NO PATIENTS WERE EXCLUDED BASED ON AGE, FRAILTY, OR COGNITIVE STATUS. THE STUDY POPULATION HAD A MEAN AGE OF 83.3 YEARS AT THE TIME OF SURGERY (RANGE 57-104) AND A MEAN BMI OF 20.7 (RANGE 11.4-28.9). THE FINAL FOLLOW-UP WA
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 14159703 ↗InjuryApr 19, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
ON 02-MAR-2022, A JOURNAL ARTICLE WAS RETRIEVED FROM THE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY (2021) THAT REPORTED A STUDY FROM (B)(6) THAT LOOKED AT THE IMPACT OF THE SURGICAL APPROACH ON POSTOPERATIVE DISLOCATIONS. THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY WAS TO EVALUATE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF HEMIARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED USING THE CPP (CONJOINED TENDON PRESERVING POSTERIOR) APPROACH FOR FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES. THE STUDY REVIEWED 322 PATIENTS WITH FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES. A BIPOLAR HEMIARTHROPLASTY WAS PERFORMED IN ALL PATIENTS USING A PRESS-FIT TAPERLOC STEM AND RINGLOC BIPOLAR CUP. TWO PATIENTS WERE EXCLUDED FROM THE STUDY DUE TO RECEIVING A TOTAL HIP AT THE TIME OF SURGERY, LEAVING 320 PATIENTS FOR FINAL REVIEW. NO PATIENTS WERE EXCLUDED BASED ON AGE, FRAILTY, OR COGNITIVE STATUS. THE STUDY POPULATION HAD A MEAN AGE OF 83.3 YEARS AT THE TIME OF SURGERY (RANGE 57-104) AND A MEAN BMI OF 20.7 (RANGE 11.4-28.9). THE FINAL FOLLOW-UP WAS CONDUCTED AT 9.1 +/- 1.5 MONTHS AFTER SURGERY (RANGE 6-17 MONTHS). COMPLAINT 13: THE STUDY REPORTED THAT 1 PATIENT EXPERIENCED CEREBRAL INFARCTION (STROKE) IN AN UNKNOWN TIME FRAME POSTOP. THE PATIENT MADE NO RECOVERY AND WAS LOST TO FURTHER FOLLOW UP.
Patient problems: Stroke/CVA
MAUDE report 14140240 ↗InjuryMar 4, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED, THAT: THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A LEFT HIP PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2021. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT SUFFERS FROM HIP PAIN AND STIFFNESS AS WELL AS LIMITED EXERCISE. THE ONSET OF COMPLICATIONS WAS (B)(6) 2021. PATIENT OUTCOME: A PROLONGED EPISODE OF CARE.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 13665923 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2021Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement; Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement
IT WAS REPORTED : (B)(6) HOSPITAL PERFORMED A DOUBLE-ACTION TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY ON THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2021. POSTOPERATIVE EXAMINATION REVEALED THAT THE PROSTHESIS WAS DISLOCATED INTERNALLY AND THE FEMORAL HEAD WAS DISLOCATED FROM THE LINER, FOLLOWED BY ANOTHER INCISIONAL SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021 TO REPLACE THE FEMORAL HEAD AND LINER AND THEN REPOSITIONED.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 13001305 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2021Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement; Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: (B)(6) PERFORMED AA DOUBLE-ACTION LEFT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY ON THE PATIENT ON (B)(6) 2021. POSTOPERATIVE EXAMINATION REVEALED THAT THE PROSTHESIS WAS DISLOCATED INTERNALLY AND THE FEMORAL HEAD WAS DISLOCATED FROM THE LINER. SUBSEQUENTLY REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFUMED ON (B)(6) 2021 TO REPLACE THE FEMORAL HEAD AND LINER AND THEN REPOSITIONED. NO FURTHER OUTCOME.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 12997891 ↗InjuryDec 9, 2021Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement; Mechanical Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Unintended Movement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT: (B)(6) HOSPITAL OF (B)(6) UNIVERSITY PERFORMED A DOUBLE-ACTION TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT SURGERY ON THE PATIENT ON (B)(6). POSTOPERATIVE EXAMINATION REVEALED THAT THE PROSTHESIS WAS DISLOCATED INTERNALLY AND THE FEMORAL HEAD WAS DISLOCATED FROM THE LINER, FOLLOWED BY ANOTHER INCISIONAL SURGERY ON (B)(6) TO REPLACE THE FEMORAL HEAD AND LINER AND THEN REPOSITIONED. PATIENT INVOLVEMENT: REVISION.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 12966219 ↗MalfunctionAug 20, 2021Positioning Problem; Positioning Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2021, THE BIOLOX DELTA HEAD WAS DIFFICULT TO POSITION WITH THE BIPOLAR LINER. THE DEVICES WERE USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12347036 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page