Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-9504MRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · UNIVERS REVERS GLENO 39 · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867061354), received between Mar 21, 2019 and Apr 28, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Material Protrusion/Extrusion1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionApr 28, 2023Break; Break

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A SURGERY FOR THE DISLOCATED EPIPHYSE THE 135° SCREW BROKE OFF. NO FURTHER INFORMATION RECEIVED. (B)(6) 2023, UPDATE DW. FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH AN ARTHREX IMPLANT IN THE PAST. THE PATIENT SUFFERED AN INJURY WHICH RESULTED IN AN DISLOCATED PROSTHESIS CUP. DURING THE SURGERY ON 24TH FEBRUARY IT WAS THEN NOTICED THAT SCREW WHICH WAS PLACED AT 135° WAS BROKEN OFF. THE SURGEON THEN MOVED THE CUB AND FIXATED THE SCREW AT 155° AND THE BROKEN SCREW WAS NOT REMOVED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 16838020 ↗
  • InjuryApr 7, 2021Material Protrusion/Extrusion

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION WAS NECESSARY AFTER A DISTAL PROTRUSION OF THE LONG HUMERAL SHAFT. THE PATIENT WILL BE REHABILITATED AT A LATER DATE AFTER A HUMERAL BONE GRAFTING PROCEDURE. THE BASE PLATE INCLUDING SCREWS HAVE REMAINED IN THE PATIENT. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WERE PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11630386 ↗
  • InjuryMar 21, 2019Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A TSA PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2018. 9 MONTHS POST-OP, ON (B)(6) 2019, THE PATIENT WAS SEEN BY THEIR SURGEON FOR A FOLLOW-UP VISIT WHERE AN X-RAY WAS TAKEN TO DETERMINE PROGRESS. THE X-RAY SHOWED THAT THE BASEPLATE AND GLENOSPHERE WERE DISLOCATED. THE PATIENT STATED THAT NO TRAUMA HAD OCCURRED. A COPY OF THE X-RAY IS UNABLE TO BE OBTAINED. A REVISION SURGERY TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2019 AND THE FOLLOWING DEVICES WERE ALL EXPLANTED: AR-9145-30 / LOT: 170156313, AR-9145-36 / LOT: 170139313, AR-9504M / LOT: 140119609, AR-9503M-06 / LOT: 160010109, AR-9120-01 / LOT: 170145515, AND AR-9165-20 / LOT: 150008108. THE SURGEON SWITCHED TO AN RTSA AND IMPLANTED THE FOLLOWING: AR-9502-39ARCA / LOT: 261519 AND AR-9550-19RCA / LOT: 10031668. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDED 3/29/2019: THE AR-9145-30 SCREW BROKE UPON REMOVAL OF HARDWARE. TIP WAS RETRIEVED.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8440380 ↗

Other shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration devices

All shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page