Arthrex® AR-513-BG10Recalls & reported problems
Arthrex, Inc. · IBAL TKA,BEARING IMP,PS,SZ 6,10MM · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00888867107458), received between Dec 9, 2016 and Dec 9, 2016 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Operates Differently Than Expected” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
Patient problems
- No Code Available1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 9, 2016Device Operates Differently Than Expected
IT WAS REPORTED THAT ON (B)(6) 2015 THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A LEFT TKA PROCEDURE DURING WHICH ARTHREX IBALANCE TKA DEVICES WERE IMPLANTED. ON (B)(6) 2015, WHILE AT PHYSICAL THERAPY, THE PATIENT'S THERAPIST NOTICED THAT THE KNEE WAS NOT CORRECTING. ON (B)(6) 2015, THE PATIENT WENT TO SEE THE ORIGINAL SURGEON WHO RECOMMENDED EITHER A LATERAL RELEASE OR A TOTAL REVISION SURGERY TO CORRECT THE KNEE. ON (B)(6) 2016 PATIENT WAS SEEN BY A NEW SURGEON FOR A SECOND OPINION AND A LEFT TKA REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2016 BY THE NEW SURGEON AT A DIFFERENT FACILITY THAN THE ORIGINAL SURGERY FACILITY. PATIENT REPORTS THAT THE FOLLOWING ARTHREX DEVICES WERE EXPLANTED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY: AR-503-TTTF, IBALANCE SIZE 5 TIBIAL TRAY, LOT: 108761211 ((B)(4) (B)(6)), AR-516-5L, FEMORAL IMPLANT, LOT 1373716 ((B)(4) (B)(6)) AND AR-513-BG10, BEARING IMPLANT, LOT 113601341 ((B)(4) (B)(6)). THE ORIGINAL ARTHREX PATELLA IMPLANT WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT AND ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S PRODUCT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE TKA REVISION. THE PATIENT REQUESTED AND HAS KEPT THE EXPLANTED ARTHREX DEVICES.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6157544 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices
- ATTUNE 1512-14-050Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER106 reports
- ATTUNE 1504-40-205Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall53 reports
- ATTUNE 1504-40-105Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall46 reports
- ATTUNE 1547-06-001Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall37 reports
- ATTUNE 1513-12-060Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER72 reports
- Triathlon 5521-B-300Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall19 reports
- Triathlon 5531-G-709-EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall19 reports
- ATTUNE 1512-16-080Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall16 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page