Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-513-T2Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · iBalance TKA, Modular Tibial Tray, Sz 2 · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00888867187856), received between Oct 7, 2025 and Oct 7, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Degraded” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Degraded1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 7, 2025Degraded; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Degraded; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 10/14/2025: PER THE PATIENT'S MEDICAL RECORDS, THE PATIENT REPORTED PERSISTENT PAIN RATED BETWEEN 7/10 AND 9/10, STIFFNESS, AND LIMITED RANGE OF MOTION FROM THE TIME OF IMPLANTATION. THE PATIENT WAS UNABLE TO RETURN TO THE PREVIOUS LEVEL OF ACTIVITY AND RELIED ON A CANE FOR MOBILITY. FREQUENT FALLS AND FUNCTIONAL DECLINE WERE NOTED, INCLUDING DIFFICULTY WITH DAILY TASKS SUCH AS SHOPPING AND EXERCISING. IMAGING AND CT SCANS PERFORMED IN 2024 SHOWED NO GROSS MALPOSITIONING, BUT MILD TIBIAL ROTATION WAS NOTED. DESPITE THESE FINDINGS, THE PATIENT CONTINUED TO EXPERIENCE DEBILITATING SYMPTOMS. A SURGICAL PATHOLOGY REPORT DATED (B)(6) 2025 CONFIRMED MECHANICAL LOOSENING OF THE IMPLANT AND DEGENERATIVE CHANGES IN THE SURROUNDING BONE AND SYNOVIAL TISSUE. PHYSICAL THERAPY RECORDS POST-REVISION DOCUMENTED IMPROVED GAIT, REDUCED SWELLING, AND PROGRESS TOWARD FUNCTIONAL GOALS, INCLUDING STAIR CLIMBING AND SIT-TO-STAND EXERCISES. PAIN LEVELS DECREASED TO AN AVERAGE OF 2¿5/10, WITH CONTINUED MONITORING AND REHABILITATION.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Failure of Implant; Pain

    MAUDE report 23238005 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page