Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-9562-40NLRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · 4.5x40mm Peripheral Screw, NON-LOCKING · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867296756), received between Jan 12, 2021 and Nov 19, 2024 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Break1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information2
  • Pain2
  • Post Operative Wound Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 19, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    ON 10/28/2024, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT AN AR-9564-2442-LAT GLENOSPHERE AND GLENOSPHERE SET SCREW DISENGAGED FROM THE BASEPLATE. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023 FOR A REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY. POSTOPERATIVELY THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED PAIN AND A CT SCAN REVEALED GLENOSPHERE AND GLENOSPHERE SET SCREW DISENGAGED FROM THE BASEPLATE. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY IN WHICH A NEW GLENOSPHERE ALONG WITH HUMERAL COMPONENTS WERE IMPLANTED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 11/4/2024: DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE AR-9502F-39LCPC SUTURECUP, THE AR-9503-3942-3 HUMERAL INSERT, THE AR-9501-07P HUMERAL STEM, THE AR-9582-20 MODULAR POST, THE AR-9563-28 PERIPHERAL LOCKING SCREW, THE AR-9563-16 PERIPHERAL LOCKING SCREW, THE AR-9563-20 PERIPHERAL LOCKING SCREW, THE AR-9562-40NL PERIPHERAL LOCKING SCREW, THE AR-9580-2010-2S BASEPLATE, AND AR-9564-2442-LAT GLENOSPHERE WAS REMOVED. BOTH PROCEDURES WERE PERFORMED BY THE SAME SURGEON AND AT THE SAME FACILITY.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 20726301 ↗
  • InjuryAug 5, 2024Break; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Break; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED ON 11/4/2024: ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT'S IMPLANTS WERE CONVERTED FROM FAILED REVERS TO A HEMIARTHROPLASTY DUE TO THE DISPLACED GLENOID COMPONENTS FROM THE BROKEN SCREWS. AT THIS TIME, IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH ARTHREX PRODUCTS FROM THE ORIGINAL SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023 WERE EXPLANTED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 19907222 ↗
  • InjuryMar 21, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON 3/1/2023, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA EMAIL THAT A SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY REVISION SURGERY TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2023 DUE TO AN INFECTION. THE SURGEON REMOVED AN AR-9560-28 ARTHREX UNIVERS REVERS MODULAR GLENOID SYSTEM MODULAR BASEPLATE, AN AR-9502F-42LCPC ARTHREX UNIVERS REVERS SUTURE CUP, AN AR-9564-2842 ARTHREX UNIVERS REVERS MODULAR GLENOID SYSTEM GLENOSPHERE, AN AR-9503L-03 ARTHREX UNIVERS REVERS HUMERAL INSERT, (2) AR-9563-20 UNIVERS REVERS MODULAR GLENOID SYSTEM PERIPHERAL LOCKING SCREW, AN AR-9562-28NL UNIVERS REVERS MODULAR GLENOID SYSTEM PERIPHERAL NON-LOCKING SCREW, AN AR-9562-40NL UNIVERS REVERS MODULAR GLENOID SYSTEM PERIPHERAL NON-LOCKING SCREW, AN AR-9561-25P UNIVERS REVERS MODULAR GLENOID SYSTEM CENTRAL POST MODULA, AND AN AR-9501-05P UNIVERS REVERS HUMERAL STEM.

    Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection

    MAUDE report 16582155 ↗
  • InjuryMar 15, 2021Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    IT WAS REPORTED THROUGH THE SURGICAL OUTCOME SYSTEM THAT A REVISION SURGERY IS REQUIRED DUE TO THE LOOSENING OF AN ARTHREX PROSTHETIC JOINT. THE PRIMARY SURGERY TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2020. THE COMPLICATION WAS REPORTED ON (B)(6) 2020; INDICATING LOOSENING OF PROSTHETIC JOINT AND A REVISION REQUIRED. THE REVISION SURGERY TOOK PLACE ON (B)(6) 2021. THE FOLLOWING ARTHREX PRODUCT WAS EXPLANTED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY; AR-9560-24 (LOT: 5655), AR-9561-20P (LOT: 7038), AR-9562-36NL (LOT: 2018005757), AR-9562-40NL (LOT: 2018001457), AR-9563-20 (LOT: 2019003063), AR-9564-2436-LAT (LOT: 19.03388), AR-9502F-36RCPC (LOT: 19.00394), AR-9503S-06 (LOT: 170052510). THE FOLLOWING ARTHREX PRODUCT WAS IMPLANTED DURING THE REVISION SURGERY; AR-9502F-36RCPC (LOT: 20.01053), AR-9555-06 (LOT: 170143213), AR-9503S-06 (LOT: 20.01369).

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11485338 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 12, 2021Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO RETRIEVE THE PROSTHESIS. IT WAS FURTHER REPORTED THAT THE DEFECTIVE PROSTHESIS WAS CAUSED DUE TO THE POST OPERATIVE ACTIONS BY THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT DID NOT FOLLOW THE POST OP GUIDELINES AND WAS OVERLOADING THE PROSTHESIS TOO EARLY IN THE GYM.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11153789 ↗

Other shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration devices

All shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page