Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-7292Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · SuturePatch Trapezoid, 45 x 35mm · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867301962), received between Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 2 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient Device Interaction Problem2

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body Reaction2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 18, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem

    On 16 September 2026, it was reported by a Sales Representative via email that an AR-7292, SuturePatch Trapezoid 45 x 35mm was reported to have the patient treated for a large rotator cuff repair using fibertak medial and push locks lateral. the patient was augmented using a suturepatch and fixed with fiberstitch 1.5mm medial. Following the repair, which was successful, the patient presented with welts on outer skin and redness around the incision sites. upon further investigation, the patients joint was inflamed and there was a response. The patient was re-operated on (b)(6) 2026 where the patch was removed and debrided. This occurred on (b)(6) 2026 during a RCR Cuff repair and Augmentation with Suture Patch Procedure. The case was completed successfully re-operating to remove the patch. There was case involvement.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction

    MAUDE report 50818271 ↗
  • InjurySep 18, 2026Patient Device Interaction Problem

    On 16 September 2026, it was reported by a Sales Representative via email that an AR-7292, SuturePatch Trapezoid 45 x 35mm was reported to have the case done on (b)(6). Large Rotator Cuff Repair, FiberTak 2.6mm Medial, into 3.5mm Pushlock Laterally. The Cuff was augmented with a Suture Patch graft and fixated with Fiber stitch 1.5mm in an all-arthroscopic repair. The patient presented with an inflammatory response 3 months post op and was reoperated on (b)(6) 2026 to debride and clean out. Biopsy was taken and the report showed an immune reaction not and infection. This occurred on (b)(6) 2026 during a Rotator Cuff Repair Procedure. The case was completed successfully. There was case involvement.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body Reaction

    MAUDE report 50818142 ↗

Other Mesh, surgical, non-absorbable, orthopaedics, reinforcement of tendon devices

All Mesh, surgical, non-absorbable, orthopaedics, reinforcement of tendon devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page