Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-4158P-16BRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · DynaNite PIP - Bent 16 w/inserter only · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00888867310094), received between Oct 15, 2025 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Arthralgia1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Malunion of Bone1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 15, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ON (B)(6) 2025, A FACILITY REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED THAT A PATIENT ENROLLED IN THE CLINICAL STUDY 'PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF HAMMER TOE FIXATION USING AN INTRAMEDULLARY NITINOL IMPLANT' DEVELOPED MALLET TOES IN ALL OPERATIVE TOES; HOWEVER, THE IMPLANTS ARE INTACT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 10/3/2025. THE PATIENT UNDERWENT INITIAL SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2023, DURING WHICH AN AR-4158DS-16B DYNANITE PIP, AN AR-4158P-16B DYNANITE PIP, AN AR-4158DS-14B DYNANITE PIP, AND AN AR-4158P-12B DYNANITE PIP WERE PLACED. ON (B)(6) 2023, THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER EXPRESSED CONCERN ABOUT A POSSIBLE RECURRENCE OF DEFORMITY AND RECOMMENDED EXTENSION EXERCISES. AT THE (B)(6) 2023 VISIT, THE PATIENT WAS NOTED TO HAVE PASSIVELY CORRECTABLE CLAW TOES. BY (B)(6) 2024, MALLET TOE DEFORMITIES WERE OBSERVED IN TOES 2, 3, 4, AND 5, ALONG WITH PAIN IN THE PLANTAR PLATE AREA OF THOSE TOES. AN MRI WAS RECOMMENDED TO ASSESS FOR POSSIBLE PLANTAR PLATE TEARS, BUT THE PATIENT DECLINED. THROUGHOUT THESE VISITS, THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED MILD PAIN AND STIFFNESS IN THE TOES. NO TREATMENT WAS PURSUED FOR THE MALLET TOES, AND THE HEALTHCARE PROVIDER ADVISED THE PATIENT TO RETURN IF PAIN WORSENED. THE PATIENT HAS NOT RETURN

    Patient problems: Arthralgia; Failure of Implant; Malunion of Bone

    MAUDE report 23277765 ↗

Other PIN, FIXATION, SMOOTH devices

All PIN, FIXATION, SMOOTH devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page