Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-9580-2410-2Recalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · 24MM BASEPLATE, 10° FULL AUG, +2 LAT, OB · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867341685), received between Aug 8, 2024 and Nov 18, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 1 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 18, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    ON 10/28/2025, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA EMAIL THAT TWO AR-9502-39ARCA UNIVERS REVERS CA HUMERAL HEAD ADAPTER 39 COMPONENTS COULD NOT BE SECURED DURING SURGERY. THE PROCEDURE WAS A REVISION REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2025. DURING THE OPERATION, THE ORIGINAL LINER WAS REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. WHEN ATTEMPTING TO PLACE BOTH AR-9502-39ARCA UNIVERS REVERS CA HUMERAL HEAD ADAPTER 39 INTO THE 39 SUTURE CUP, NEITHER ADAPTER WOULD SNAP INTO PLACE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS RECEIVED ON 11/03/2025: THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY ON (B)(6) 2025 FOLLOWING A FALL-RELATED INCIDENT. DURING THE PROCEDURE, ATTEMPTS TO IMPLANT TWO COMPONENTS, AR-9502-39ARCA UNIVERS REVERS CA HUMERAL HEAD ADAPTER 39 AND AR-9556-22RCA UNIVERS REVERS CA HUMERAL HEAD 56/22, WERE UNSUCCESSFUL AS THEY COULD NOT BE SECURED. THIS ISSUE EXTENDED THE SURGICAL TIME BY APPROXIMATELY 30 MINUTES. AS PART OF THE REVISION, ALL IMPLANTS FROM THE ORIGINAL REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED IN (B)(6) 2023 WERE EXPLANTED. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY WAS PERFORMED AT THE SAME FACILITY BY THE SAME SURGEON AND HAD NO REPORTED INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS. THE ARTHREX PRODUCTS IMPLANTED

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 23586411 ↗
  • InjuryAug 8, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    ON 7/18/2024, A CLINDEX NOTIFICATION WAS RECEIVED INDICATING THAT A PATIENT LISTED ON THE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY REGISTRY SUFFERED BONE FRACTURES IN THE TARGET SHOULDER. THIS EVENT WAS INDICATED AS POSSIBLY RELATED TO THE UNIVERS REVERS DEVICES IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2024. ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT STARTED TO EXPERIENCE PAIN. IT WAS SUSPECTED THE PATIENT SUFFERED AN ACROMIAL FRACTURE, WHICH WAS CONFIRMED IN APRIL VIA CT SCAN. THE PATIENT WAS IMMOBILIZED IN A SLING FOR SIX WEEKS. ON (B)(6) 2024, THE PATIENT REPORTED NO PAIN; X-RAY IMAGES REVEALED A HEALED FRACTURE. THE PATIENT DID NOT SUFFER A FALL OR HAVE AN INJURY. THE PAIN BEGAN AFTER PHYSICAL THERAPY. THE IMPLANTS ARE NOT LOOSE OR BROKEN.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Pain

    MAUDE report 19940155 ↗

Other shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration devices

All shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page