Skip to content

Arthrex® AR-9580-2410SRecalls & reported problems

Arthrex, Inc. · 24MM BASEPLATE, 10° FULL AUG, ST · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888867352056), received between Nov 18, 2025 and Jan 12, 2026 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1
  • Positioning Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 12, 2026Positioning Failure

    ON (B)(6) 2025, A SALES REPRESENTATIVE REPORTED VIA PHONE THAT AN AR-9563-16 PERIPHERAL LOCKING SCREW DID NOT LOCK INTO AN AR-9580-2410S 24MM BASE PLATE DURING A REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2025. THE ISSUE WAS RESOLVED BY USING TWO REPLACEMENT AR-9563-20 PERIPHERAL LOCKING SCREWS (5.5 X 20 MM) TO COMPLETE THE CASE. THERE WAS NO DELAY, NO ADDITIONAL ANESTHESIA, AND NO REPORTED PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24035721 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 18, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ON 10/21/2025, IT WAS REPORTED BY A SALES REPRESENTATIVE VIA (B)(4). THAT AN AR-9580-2410S 24MM BASEPLATE REAMER DID NOT ENGAGE IN THE MODULAR DRIVE SHAFT. WHEN IT WAS LIGHTLY TAPPED WITH A MALLET TO GET IT TO ENGAGE WITH THE MODULAR DRIVER, IT BECAME BOUND TOGETHER. THIS WAS DISCOVERED DURING THE CASE WITH NO PATIENT HARM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23581233 ↗

Other shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration devices

All shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page