DJO SURGICAL 427-42-150Recalls & reported problems
Encore Medical, L.P. · REVELATION microMAX, REDUCED NECK, SZ 15.0 RIGHT · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888912080996), received between Dec 22, 2016 and Jan 3, 2021 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fracture2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
Patient problems
- No Code Available2
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Fall1
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJan 3, 2021Fracture; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
REVISION SURGERY - PATIENT FELL AND HAD A FRACTURE HIP.
Patient problems: Fall
MAUDE report 11105640 ↗InjuryOct 27, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated
REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO THE STEM HAVING SUBSIDED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6985489 ↗InjuryFeb 28, 2017Loose or Intermittent Connection
REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO THE PATIENT HAVING A LOOSE STEM.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6366482 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2016Fracture
REVISION SURGERY - THE PATIENT CAME IN FOR THE 2 WEEK POST OP CHECK-UP, EVERYTHING WAS FINE, X-RAY LOOKED GREAT. THEY CAME BACK FOR THE 4 WEEK CHECK-UP AND REPORTED PAIN. AN X-RAY FOUND A FRACTURE. THE PATIENT REPORTED NO FALL OR FORCE. STRESS FRACTURE FROM IMPLANT
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Pain
MAUDE report 6201496 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer devices
- Novation 134-36-45Exactech, Inc. · Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer2 recalls0 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-28-650Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer89 reports
- Trident 690-00-28FHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall37 reports
- Trident 690-00-22EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall36 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-652Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer75 reports
- Trident 690-00-22DHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall22 reports
- PINNACLE 1218-32-654Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer70 reports
- Trident 69-2850Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer1 recall11 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page