Skip to content

DJO SURGICAL 436-28-007Recalls & reported problems

Encore Medical, L.P. · LINER, ACETABULAR, FMP CONSTRAINED 28XMP7 · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
8
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
8
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888912085700), received between Apr 18, 2018 and Sep 12, 2024 — classified as 8 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Break1
  • Defective Component1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Metal Shedding Debris1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • No Information1
  • Pain1
  • Skin Discoloration1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 12, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO DISLOCATION.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 20208620 ↗
  • InjuryMar 29, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO CUP WAS VERTICAL.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 16640419 ↗
  • InjuryJun 8, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY DUE TO AN INFECTION. WASHOUT.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 14634444 ↗
  • InjuryJul 22, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY - PATIENT DISLOCATED OUT PREVIOUS IMPLANTED CONSTRAINED LINER.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12213201 ↗
  • InjuryJan 7, 2021Defective Component; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    SECOND REVISION SURGERY - THE CONSTRAINED LOCKING RING FAILED. SURGEON CEMENTED IN A STRYKER CONSTRAINED LINER AND CHANGED HEAD TO A 22 MM.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11133588 ↗
  • InjuryAug 30, 2019Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Malposition of Device; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO THE PATIENT HAVING PULLED OUT OF THE PREVIOUS CONSTRAINED LINER. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE PREVIOUS COMPONENTS AND REPLACED THEM. HE WILL BE GOING BACK IN, IN THE FUTURE TO REMOVE THE CUP. THE CUP IS IN A VERY VERTICAL POSITION.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 8951279 ↗
  • InjuryAug 23, 2019Break; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    SECOND REVISION SURGERY - PATIENT PRESENTED WITH DISCOLORATION. SHE HAD POSTERIOR IMPINGEMENT FROM THE STEM. THE STEM HAD BROKEN THE LINER. SURGEON CHANGED THE PROXIMAL BODY ON THE STEM (NOT DJO) TO HAVE MORE OFFSET AND MORE HEAD HEIGHT TO RELIEVE IMPINGEMENT. LINER WAS REPLACED.

    Patient problems: Skin Discoloration

    MAUDE report 8925929 ↗
  • InjuryApr 18, 2018Metal Shedding Debris

    SECOND REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO THE PATIENT COMPLAINING OF PAIN DUE TO METALLOSIS.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 7441248 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Constrained, Cemented Or Uncemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page