Skip to content

DJO SURGICAL 931-28-748Recalls & reported problems

Encore Medical, L.P. · LINER/NON-HOODED-NEU, MP5, HXe-plus, 28mm · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00888912099431), received between Jan 9, 2018 and Jan 18, 2022 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loose or Intermittent Connection” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Information1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 18, 2022Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY - DUE TO STEM LOOSENING.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13284487 ↗
  • InjuryJan 6, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION SURGERY: PATIENT WAS INFECTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 13173659 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 18, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION SURGERY: PATIENT HAD AN INFECTION.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9720007 ↗
  • InjuryDec 23, 2019Patient-Device Incompatibility

    SECOND REVISION SURGERY - PATIENT HAD PREVIOUS HIP REVISION SURGERY AND WAS STILL EXPERIENCING PAIN. SURGEON ELECTED TO REMOVE THE STEM THAT WAS IMPLANTED (NOT DJO) AND REVISE IT TO ANOTHER SYSTEM (NOT DJO). HE REQUESTED A NEW LINER WITH A LARGER HEAD OPTION. SO, WE REVISED THE LINER FROM 28MM DIAMETER TO 32MM OPTION.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 9511010 ↗
  • InjuryJan 9, 2018Unstable; Malposition of Device

    REVISION SURGERY - THE PATIENT WAS UNSTABLE DUE TO THE POSITION THE SURGEON PUT THE CUP IN.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 7175339 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Polymer, Porous Uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page