Skip to content

Tapered Screw-Vent® TSV4H16Recalls & reported problems

ZimVie US Corp LLC · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Tapered Screw-Vent (131)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
7
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889024019331), received between Sep 27, 2020 and Nov 12, 2025 — classified as 7 injuries.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem7

Patient problems

  • Osteolysis4
  • Inflammation3
  • Swelling/ Edema3
  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Wound Dehiscence2
  • No Code Available1
  • No Information1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 12, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE DENTAL IMPLANTS LOCATED IN TOOTH SITES #32 AND #31 FAILED DUE TO INFECTION. THE DOCTOR REPORTED INFLAMMATION, EDEMA, AND THAT BOTH AUTOGENOUS AND HETEROLOGOUS GRAFTS WERE USED.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23535705 ↗
  • InjuryNov 23, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT AT TOOTH SITE # 5 WAS REMOVED DUE TO BONE LOSS. SYMPTOMS AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT: PAIN.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis; Pain

    MAUDE report 20766460 ↗
  • InjurySep 14, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT AT TOOTH SITE #13 WAS REMOVED DUE TO MEDICAL BONE LOSS.

    Patient problems: Osteolysis

    MAUDE report 15419210 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO INFECTION, BONE LOSS, EDEMA, INFLAMMATION AND WOUND DEHISCENCE. THE DOCTOR CONFIRMS THAT THE DENTAL SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS NOT COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER IMPLANT AND THAT THE PATIENT DID NOT SUFFER ANY TYPE OF NEGATIVE IMPACT ON HIS HEALTH AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Osteolysis; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 14889387 ↗
  • InjuryJul 1, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED DUE TO INFECTION AND BONE LOSS AT THE IMPLANT SITE.

    Patient problems: Inflammation; Osteolysis; Swelling/ Edema; Unspecified Infection; Wound Dehiscence

    MAUDE report 14884382 ↗
  • InjuryDec 15, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT IN TOOTH LOCATION #11 HAD LACK OF PRIMARY STABILITY AND NO OTHER IMPLANT WAS PLACED IN THE SAME SURGERY.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 11007912 ↗
  • InjurySep 27, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE IMPLANT AT TOOTH SITE # 13 WAS UNABLE TO BE PLACE IN OSTEOTOMY AND WAS REMOVED. ATTEMPTED EXTRACTION WITH IMMEDIATE IMPLANT BUCCAL DEHISCENCE, DID GRAFT DELAY FOR HEALING NO TIME REPORTED. ADDITIONAL APPOINTMENT REQUIRED: YES, TO REPLACE IMPLANT. SYMPTOMS AS A RESULT OF THE EVENT: NONE REPORTED NO INJURY TO PATIENT OTHER THAN IMPLANT BEING REMOVED. NO PERMANENT IMPAIRMENT DUE TO THE TIME THE IMPLANT WAS IN THE PATIENTS¿ MOUTH, IT IS DETERMINED THAT THE COMPLAINT CATEGORY REFLECTED AS UNABLE TO PLACE IN OSTEOTOMY.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 10591263 ↗

Other IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices

All IMPLANT, ENDOSSEOUS, ROOT-FORM devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page