Skip to content

Trilogy® Longevity® 6320-56-32Recalls & reported problems

Zimmer, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Trilogy Longevity (29)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889024125599), received between May 23, 2024 and May 29, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 2 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Naturally Worn1

Patient problems

  • Fall1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 29, 2024Naturally Worn; Naturally Worn

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT APPROXIMATELY 3 TO 4 WEEKS POST IMPLANTATION OF A TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY, THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH PAIN. THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN BACK TO THE OPERATING ROOM FOR A HIP REVISION, WHERE THE ACETABULAR LINER AND FEMORAL HEADBALL WERE REVISED. UNUSUAL WEAR AND SOME DEFECTS WERE REPORTEDLY NOTED ON THE LINER. THE SURGEON WAS NOT SURE IF THIS WAS FROM SOME BONE REMAINING IN THE ACETABULAR LINER OR ANOTHER ISSUE. THERE WERE NO SURGICAL COMPLICATIONS. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 19418581 ↗
  • InjuryMay 23, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY NEARLY ONE YEAR POST IMPLANTATION DUE TO DISLOCATION. THE PATIENT SUFFERED A FALL AND DISLOCATED SEVERAL TIMES. THE LINER WAS EXCHANGED.

    Patient problems: Fall; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 19386630 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page