Continuum® Trilogy® Allofit® Longevity® 00-8752-010-32Recalls & reported problems
Zimmer, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Continuum Trilogy Allofit Longevity (39)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889024149717), received between May 5, 2022 and Mar 14, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Insert4
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
- Positioning Failure1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- Failure of Implant1
- Joint Dislocation1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 14, 2025Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY THE LINER AND CUP WOULD NOT MATE. THE SURGEON MADE SEVERAL ATTEMPTS BY HITTING IT, RESULTING IN THE LOOSENING OF THE CUP. A NEW CUP AND LINER WERE USED, AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO KNOWN IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE, AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21604564 ↗InjuryMay 21, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE 7 MONTHS AND 7 DAYS POST IMPLANTATION DUE TO MALALIGNMENT, SOCKET DISLOCATION AND SUBLUXATION. THE CUP, HEAD AND LINER WERE ALL REVISED. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation
MAUDE report 19358925 ↗MalfunctionApr 23, 2024Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19165833 ↗InjuryJul 18, 2023Unstable; Unstable
NO ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION TO REPORT AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 17342371 ↗MalfunctionMay 19, 2023Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LINER WOULD NOT ASSEMBLE WITH THE CUP DURING SURGERY. THERE WAS NO HARM OR DELAY REPORTED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER LINER AND THE SAME CUP. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16960839 ↗MalfunctionJul 11, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED AFTER STRIKING THE LINER AGAINST THE GROOVE OF THE CUP, IT WAS FOUND THAT IT COULD NOT BE ASSEMBLED IN PLACE. THE LINER WAS STRUCK AGAIN AND STILL COULD NOT BE ASSEMBLED IN PLACE. AFTER TWO REPEATED BLOWS, THE POLYETHYLENE LINED PROSTHESIS WAS ABANDONED AND ASSEMBLED FOR THE FIRST TIME AFTER SWITCHING TO A CERAMIC LINER. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14978135 ↗MalfunctionMay 5, 2022Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ACETABULUM 52 WAS OPENED, AND AT THE TIME OF PLACING LINER 36, IT DID NOT FIX INSIDE THE ACETABULUM, SO A NEW LINER 32 WAS OPENED BECAUSE THE MEDICAL TEAM THOUGHT THAT LINER 36 WAS DEFECTIVE. WHEN THEY USED THE LINER 32, IT DIDN'T FIX IT IN THE ACETABULUM EITHER. THE DOCTOR TOOK OUT THE 52 ACETABULUM AND TESTED BOTH LINERS OUTSIDE THE PATIENT, AND NEITHER ONE OF THEM FIXED INSIDE THE ACETABULUM. THEY HAD TO OPEN THE 54 ACETABULUM AND THE 36 LINER TO FINISH THE SURGERY. NO ADVERSE EVENTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE MALFUNCTION. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT IS UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14287560 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page