Skip to content

Continuum® Trilogy® Allofit® Longevity® 00-8752-010-32Recalls & reported problems

Zimmer, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Continuum Trilogy Allofit Longevity (39)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889024149717), received between May 5, 2022 and Mar 14, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 5 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 1 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Insert4
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Positioning Failure1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionMar 14, 2025Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY THE LINER AND CUP WOULD NOT MATE. THE SURGEON MADE SEVERAL ATTEMPTS BY HITTING IT, RESULTING IN THE LOOSENING OF THE CUP. A NEW CUP AND LINER WERE USED, AND THE SURGERY WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO KNOWN IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE, AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21604564 ↗
  • InjuryMay 21, 2024Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION PROCEDURE 7 MONTHS AND 7 DAYS POST IMPLANTATION DUE TO MALALIGNMENT, SOCKET DISLOCATION AND SUBLUXATION. THE CUP, HEAD AND LINER WERE ALL REVISED. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 19358925 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 23, 2024Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 19165833 ↗
  • InjuryJul 18, 2023Unstable; Unstable

    NO ADDITIONAL EVENT INFORMATION TO REPORT AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 17342371 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 19, 2023Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LINER WOULD NOT ASSEMBLE WITH THE CUP DURING SURGERY. THERE WAS NO HARM OR DELAY REPORTED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING ANOTHER LINER AND THE SAME CUP. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16960839 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 11, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED AFTER STRIKING THE LINER AGAINST THE GROOVE OF THE CUP, IT WAS FOUND THAT IT COULD NOT BE ASSEMBLED IN PLACE. THE LINER WAS STRUCK AGAIN AND STILL COULD NOT BE ASSEMBLED IN PLACE. AFTER TWO REPEATED BLOWS, THE POLYETHYLENE LINED PROSTHESIS WAS ABANDONED AND ASSEMBLED FOR THE FIRST TIME AFTER SWITCHING TO A CERAMIC LINER. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14978135 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 5, 2022Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AN ACETABULUM 52 WAS OPENED, AND AT THE TIME OF PLACING LINER 36, IT DID NOT FIX INSIDE THE ACETABULUM, SO A NEW LINER 32 WAS OPENED BECAUSE THE MEDICAL TEAM THOUGHT THAT LINER 36 WAS DEFECTIVE. WHEN THEY USED THE LINER 32, IT DIDN'T FIX IT IN THE ACETABULUM EITHER. THE DOCTOR TOOK OUT THE 52 ACETABULUM AND TESTED BOTH LINERS OUTSIDE THE PATIENT, AND NEITHER ONE OF THEM FIXED INSIDE THE ACETABULUM. THEY HAD TO OPEN THE 54 ACETABULUM AND THE 36 LINER TO FINISH THE SURGERY. NO ADVERSE EVENTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE MALFUNCTION. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT IS UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14287560 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices

All PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page