Skip to content

Optio-C® 07.01873.006Recalls & reported problems

Zimmer Spine, Inc. · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889024329591), received between Apr 18, 2022 and Nov 19, 2024 — classified as 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture3
  • Device-Device Incompatibility1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 19, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT WHEN AND OPTIO-C PLATE AND PEEK IMPLANT WERE PLACED ONTO THE ASSEMBLY BLOCK DURING SURGERY ON THE BACK TABLE, THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE TWO WAS VERY LOOSE. THEY WERE NOT IMPLANTED, INSTEAD, ANOTHER SET OF IMPLANTS WERE OPENED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT; HOWEVER, THERE WAS A FIVE MINUTE DELAY FOR OPENING AND PLACEMENT OF THE NEW IMPLANTS. THIS IS REPORT ONE OF TWO FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20728034 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 3, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO OPTIO-C PLATES AND A PEEK IMPLANT WERE BROKEN UPON MALLET IMPACT AND HAD TO BE REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT IMPACT, BUT A MINIMAL DELAY TO REPLACE THE PLATES AND IMPLANT OCCURRED. THIS IS REPORT TWO OF THREE FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16296635 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 3, 2023Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO OPTIO-C PLATES AND A PEEK IMPLANT WERE BROKEN UPON MALLET IMPACT AND HAD TO BE REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE SURGERY. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT IMPACT, BUT A MINIMAL DELAY TO REPLACE THE PLATES AND IMPLANT OCCURRED. THIS IS REPORT THREE OF THREE FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16296620 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 18, 2022Fracture; Material Twisted/Bent; Fracture; Material Twisted/Bent

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE LOCKING CAP ON AN OPTIO-C PLATE "BENT OR CRACKED" UPON LOCKING; THE DOCTOR CHOSE TO LEAVE THE PLATE IMPLANTED. THERE WAS NO DELAY OR IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 14136735 ↗

Other APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY devices

All APPLIANCE, FIXATION, SPINAL INTERVERTEBRAL BODY devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page