PERSONA® Vivacit-E® 42-5121-008-16Recalls & reported problems
Zimmer, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant
All models of PERSONA Vivacit-E (285)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889024469341), received between Mar 27, 2023 and Feb 25, 2026 — classified as 2 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Difficult to Insert2
- Unstable1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions3
- Joint Laxity1
- Pain1
- Thrombosis/Thrombus1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 25, 2026Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED DURING KNEE ARTHROPLASTY THAT THE ARTICULAR SURFACE WOULD NOT LOCK INTO PLACE. ANOTHER ARTICULAR SURFACE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADVERSE EVENTS WERE REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24443860 ↗MalfunctionNov 7, 2025Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY, THE SURGEON WAS PREPARING THE FEMUR FOR A SIZE 8 COMPONENT, HOWEVER, THIS WAS DETERMINED TO BE TOO LARGE SO THE TEAM DOWNSIZED TO A SIZE 7 FEMORAL COMPONENT AND COMPLETED THE CASE. SUBSEQUENTLY, DURING CLOSING, THE SURGEON WAS NOTIFIED THAT THEY IMPLANTED THE WRONG POLY AS THE POLY USED WAS SUPPOSED TO BE IMPLANTED WITH THE LARGER FEMORAL COMPONENT. THE PATIENT HAS NOT EXPERIENCED ANY ISSUES SINCE THE SURGERY. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND ALL AVAILABLE INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23496294 ↗InjuryMay 27, 2025Unstable; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Unstable; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT REQUIRED LEFT KNEE REVISION TWO YEARS, SEVEN MONTHS POST IMPLANTATION DUE TO PAIN, INSTABILITY, AND VARUS/VALGUS JOINT LAXITY. THE POLY AND FEMORAL COMPONENTS WERE REVISED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Pain
MAUDE report 22087316 ↗InjuryJan 2, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT AN INITIAL LEFT KNEE ARTHROPLASTY. APPROXIMATELY 7 DAYS POST IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT PRESENTED TO THEIR PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER AND WAS DIAGNOSED WITH DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS. MEDICATION WAS GIVEN AS TREATMENT AND THIS WAS RESOLVED.
Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus
MAUDE report 21055676 ↗MalfunctionMar 27, 2023Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN INITIAL LEFT TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, THE ARTICULAR SURFACE WOULD NOT IMMEDIATELY SEAT ONTO THE TIBIAL TRAY DURING IMPLANTATION. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO SEAT THE BEARING WITH SOME IMPACTION. THERE WAS NO PATIENT IMPACT AND NO ADVERSE EVENTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THIS MALFUNCTION. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITHOUT FURTHER COMPLICATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16618299 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices
- ATTUNE 1512-14-050Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER106 reports
- ATTUNE 1504-40-205Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall53 reports
- ATTUNE 1504-40-105Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall46 reports
- ATTUNE 1547-06-001Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall37 reports
- ATTUNE 1513-12-060Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER72 reports
- Triathlon 5521-B-300Howmedica Osteonics Corp. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall19 reports
- Triathlon 5531-G-709-EHowmedica Osteonics Corp. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall19 reports
- ATTUNE 1512-16-080Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER1 recall16 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page