Skip to content

G7® Vivacit-E® 30113606Recalls & reported problems

Zimmer, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

All models of G7 Vivacit-E (41)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889024520202), received between Nov 22, 2024 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Insert” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 1 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult to Insert2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Joint Dislocation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 15, 2025Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE G7 LINER WAS IMPACTED INTO SHELL, SURGEON FELT IT HAD SEATED PROPERLY, THEN WHILE TRIALING LINER POPPED OUT AND NEEDED TO BE RESEATED INTO SHELL. HE HAD CHECKED TO MAKE SURE SHELL WAS CLEAN AND DRY AND SCALLOPS ALIGNED ON LINER BEFORE INSERTING. ALL SCREW HOLE COVERS, AND DOME HOLE PLUG WERE IN SITU IN SHELL. IMPACTED LINER SECOND TIME WITH HEAVY MALLET AND LINER APPEARED TO BE SEATED AND DID NOT DISLODGE DURING FINAL IMPLANTATION CHECK. IT WAS CONFIRMED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION COULD BE PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23292338 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 11, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    NO FURTHER EVENT INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 21357147 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 22, 2024Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE VIVACIT G7 POLYETHYLENE LINER DID NOT FIT INTO THE CUP AFTER ATTEMPTING IMPLANTATION. THE SURGEON USED AN ANCHORAGE TECHNIQUE THAT HAS WORKED IN THE PAST WITH THE STEM AND THE TRIAL AS WELL AS WITH THE ACETABULAR COMPONENTS. AFTER THE TECHNIQUE IS PERFORMED, A CORRECTION JOINT TEST IS PERFORMED AND CHECKED WITH A LUXATION. DURING THE LUXATION TEST, IT WAS FOUND THAT THE POLYETHYLENE INSERT JUMPS AND DETACHES FROM THE ACETABULAR COMPONENT. THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL ATTEMPT TO INSERT THE LINER. THERE WAS NO REPORTED HARM OR IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. NO DELAY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20758563 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices

All Prosthesis, hip, constrained, cemented or uncemented, metal/polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page