Spark 728-3020Recalls & reported problems
Ormco Corporation · Spark 20 / Active - Dual Arch · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00889989083453), received between Nov 8, 2023 and Mar 20, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Patient Device Interaction Problem” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Patient Device Interaction Problem1
Patient problems
- Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction1
- Necrosis1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 20, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED A PATIENT FELT INTENSE PAIN THAN USUAL IN THE AREA OF THE LEFT UPPER INCISORS, THE SYMPTOMS STARTED WHEN PATIENT USED ALIGNER STAGE 14. DURING THE USED OF ALIGNER STAGE 15, THE LEFT INCISOR BEGAN TO BE VERY SENSITIVE TO THE COLD AND CAUSED SEVERE PAIN. PATIENT VISITED THE ORTHODONTIST AND DID NOT IDENTIFY ANY ANOMALY AND RECOMMENDED MOVING FORWARD WITH THE TREATMENT AND CHANGING STAGE AS PLANNED. THE STRONG SENSITIVITY ON TOOTH CONTINUED BUT SUBSEQUENTLY DISAPPEARED. 2 WEEKS LATER, THE LEFT INCISOR BEGAN TO CHANGE COLOR TURNING GREY. PATIENT VISITED THE GENERAL DENTIST AND DIAGNOSIS IMMINENT NECROSIS OF THE TOOTH AND PROBLEM TO BE RESOLVED WITH DEVITALIZATION AND RECOLORING OF THE TOOTH.
Patient problems: Necrosis
MAUDE report 18944885 ↗InjuryNov 8, 2023Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
IT WAS REPORTED PATIENT HAD AN ALLERGIC REACTION TO THE FIRST SET OF ALIGNERS. SYMPTOMS PATIENT EXPERIENCED WERE NOT PROVIDED. BASED ON DOCTOR'S PROFESSIONAL OPINION ALLERGIC REACTION CAN BE A SERIOUS INJURY FOR POSSIBLE ANAPHYLAXIS. PATIENT DID NOT GO TO THE HOSPITAL AND WAS NOT REFERRAL TO ANOTHER TYPE OF DOCTOR. PATIENT IS FULLY RECOVERED.
Patient problems: Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction
MAUDE report 18095481 ↗
Other Aligner, Sequential devices
- Byte Day Alignes HBYTETrayStraight Smile LLC · Aligner, Sequential1 recall6,719 reports
- Byte Night Aligners NBYTETrayStraight Smile LLC · Aligner, Sequential1 recall6,053 reports
- sequential aligner 100-0352Access Dental Lab, LLC · Aligner, Sequential322 reports
- Invisalign System - Comprehensive 9000Align Technology, Inc. · Aligner, Sequential239 reports
- SureSmile® 1000Orametrix, Inc. · Aligner, Sequential134 reports
- REFINEMENT CORRECTION KIT 100-0012Access Dental Lab, LLC · Aligner, Sequential120 reports
- Candid Aligner FA-0001Candid Care CO. · Aligner, Sequential54 reports
- 3M™ Clarity™ 359-8363m Unitek Corporation · Aligner, sequential1 recall0 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.