REFLECTION 71333397Recalls & reported problems
Smith & Nephew, Inc. · REFLECTION XLPE 36MM INNER DIAMETER 0 DEGREE 62-64MM OUTER DIAMETER SIZE H · Class 2 · Implant
All models of REFLECTION (112)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03596010479747), received between Sep 5, 2019 and Jun 8, 2022 — classified as 3 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Integrity Problem” (2 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K022902, K211176); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Integrity Problem2
- Degraded1
- Naturally Worn1
Patient problems
- Injury2
- Insufficient Information1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 8, 2022Degraded; Naturally Worn; Degraded; Naturally Worn
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A THR PROCEDURE HAD BEEN PERFORMED IN 2006, THE PATIENT WAS EXPERIENCING AN UNSPECIFIED ADVERSE EVENT. A REVISION SURGERY WAS SCHEDULED (B)(6) 2022 TO REPLACE THE WORN OUT 16-YEAR-OLD REF LINER. THE CURRENT HEALTH STATUS OF THE PATIENT IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 14630141 ↗InjurySep 12, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO A POLY WEAR. POLY AND HEAD WERE REMOVED.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 9008450 ↗InjurySep 5, 2019Material Integrity Problem; Material Integrity Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO POLY WEAR. LINER AND HEAD WERE REMOVED. PRIMARY SURGERY WAS PERFORMED ON 2003.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8967582 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K022902, K211176. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0326-2025 · Oct 15, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedTandem Intl Bipolar Cocr Shell/UHMWPE Liner, TI-6AL-4V Retaining Ring, 28MM I.D. 46 MM O.D., REF 71324046, sterile, femoral head bipolar component of the Tandem Bipolar Hip System.
Other PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED devices
- PINNACLE 1217-25-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED735 reports
- NA 1365-52-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED683 reports
- APEX 1246-03-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED3 deaths613 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-20-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED2 deaths590 reports
- PINNACLE 1217-30-500Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED1 death484 reports
- NA 1365-53-000Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED404 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED388 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-32-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, HIP, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER, POROUS UNCEMENTED386 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page