R3 ACETABULAR 71331856Recalls & reported problems
Smith & Nephew, Inc. · R3 0 HOLE ACETABULAR SHELL 56MM · Class 3 · Implant
All models of R3 ACETABULAR (24)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03596010597618), received between Sep 7, 2017 and Oct 15, 2025 — classified as 7 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Connection Problem” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Connection Problem3
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
- Insufficient Device Problem Information1
- Unintended Movement1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Injury3
- Pain3
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Hip Fracture1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Unspecified Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryOct 15, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, AFTER A REVISION SURGERY PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2019 DUE TO STEM SUSPECTED LOOSENING, THE PATIENT HAS EXPERIENCED PAIN PROBLEMS WHEN WALKING, SITTING, LAYING DOWN WHILE HAVING IMPLANTED THE R3 ACETABULAR SHELL. IT IS UNKNOWN HOW THE ISSUE IS BEING HANDLED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 23302996 ↗MalfunctionNov 1, 2021Connection Problem; Connection Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING A THR SURGERY, AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE INSERT A R3 0 DEG XLPE ACET LNR 32MM X 56MM AND A R3 0 DEG XLPE ACET LNR 36MM X MM56. SURGERY WAS RESUMED, AFTER A NON-SIGNIFICANT DELAY, REMOVING THE R3 0 HOLE ACET SHELL 56MM AND REPLACING IT WITH A R3 CUP WITH 3 HOLES, A NEW 56/32 INLAY COULD ONLY BE INSERTED WITH DIFFICULTY. PATIENT WAS NOT INJURED AS CONSEQUENCE OF THIS PROBLEM.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12729734 ↗InjuryOct 12, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO A RIGHT SIDE ACETABULAR FRACTURE.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s); Hip Fracture
MAUDE report 10662775 ↗MalfunctionSep 1, 2020Connection Problem; Connection Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT, DURING SURGERY, THE OUTER CUP COULD NOT BE IMPLANTED. ANOTHER CUP OF THE SAME SIZE, FROM SMITH AND NEPHEW, WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF SURGERY WAS DELAYED. NO INJURY HAS BEEN REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10480668 ↗InjuryFeb 12, 2020Unintended Movement; Unintended Movement
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO LUXATION OF THE CUP. EXPLANTED DEVICES: R3 CUP, R3 LINER AND COMPETITOR HEAD. IN ADDITION, THIS PATIENT UNDERWENT TWO CLOSED REDUCTIONS DUE TO PREVIOUS LUXATIONS ON (B)(6) 2011 AND (B)(6) 2011.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 9700497 ↗InjuryMay 22, 2019Unstable; Unstable
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO PAIN AND INSTABILITY.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8634425 ↗InjuryDec 2, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT HAD INCREASED NICKEL, TITANIUM AND VANADIUM LEVELS. NO TREATMENT HAS BEEN GIVEN TO PATIENT.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 8123228 ↗InjurySep 27, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
IT WAS REPORTED THE PATIENT WAS COMPLAINING OF PAIN. A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO INFECTION.
Patient problems: Pain; Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7915274 ↗InjurySep 7, 2017Connection Problem; Connection Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THE LINER WOULD NOT LOCK INTO THE SHELL RESULTING IN A SURGICAL DELAY GREATER THAN 30 MINUTES.
Patient problems: Injury
MAUDE report 6849564 ↗
Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Ceramic/Metal, Cemented Or Uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented839 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented643 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented335 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented263 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-330Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented255 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-050Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented253 reports
- PINNACLE POROCOAT 1217-22-056Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented220 reports
- SUMMIT POROCOAT 1570-11-120Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/ceramic/metal, cemented or uncemented1 death204 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page