Skip to content

BI-MENTUM Cemented Cup BI-MENTUM Cemented Cup 61Recalls & reported problems

Soc Etudes Recherches Fabrication · BI-MENTUM dual mobility system - BI-MENTUM Cemented Cup metal-back cemented · Class 2 · Implant

All models of BI-MENTUM Cemented Cup (8)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 03662200015474), received between Nov 26, 2024 and Nov 26, 2024 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Joint Dislocation1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 26, 2024Loss of Osseointegration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Loss of Osseointegration; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    IMPLANT WAS REVISED AND REVIEWED FOR ANALYSIS. REASON FOR REVISION: REVISION DUE TO DISLOCATION AND CUP LOOSENING. THE NON-ARTICULAR SURFACE OF THE ACETABULAR CUP SHOWS, NO CEMENT REMAINING. CEMENT MANUFACTURER IS UNKNOWN.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 20784285 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal / Polymer, Non-Porous, Calcium Phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Uncemented, Metal / Polymer, Non-Porous, Calcium Phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page