Skip to content

ROI-A IR2422PRecalls & reported problems

LDR Spine Usa, Inc. · ROI-A MEDIAN IMPLANT PXL 23X26 H10 6° · Class 2

All models of ROI-A (20)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03662663011068), received between Dec 21, 2020 and Dec 21, 2022 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture2
  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 21, 2022Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A ROI-A CAGE FRACTURED WHILE BEING IMPLANTED. IT REMAINS IMPLANTED, BUT THE PLATES WERE UNABLE TO BE INSTALLED. THERE WAS A DELAY OF 15 MINUTES, BUT THERE WERE NO REPORTED PATIENT IMPACTS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16023431 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 8, 2021Fracture; Fracture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING SURGERY THE CAGE CRACKED WHILE THE PLATE WAS BEING INSTALLED. THE SURGEON REMOVED THE PLATE AND CAGE AND REPLACED THEM WITH ALTERNATES TO FINISH THE PROCEDURE. THERE WAS NO IMPACT ON THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11436917 ↗
  • InjuryDec 21, 2020Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED TO ADDRESS AN ROI-C PLATE THAT MIGRATED OUT OF ITS MATING CAGE POST-OPERATIVELY. THE SUPERIOR PLATE WAS REMOVED BUT THE CAGE AND INFERIOR PLATE WERE NOT EXCHANGED SINCE THEY DID NOT MIGRATE. THE REPORTER RELATED THE SUPERIOR PLATE WAS DIFFICULT TO INSTALL DURING THE INITIAL PROCEDURE; THE STARTER AWL WAS USED AND THE PATIENT HAD HARD BONE. THIS IS REPORT TWO OF TWO FOR THIS EVENT.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 11047923 ↗

Other Spinal Vertebral Body Replacement Device devices

All Spinal Vertebral Body Replacement Device devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page