Skip to content

Humelock II Cemented Reversible Shoulder 105-3600Recalls & reported problems

Fx Solutions · HUMELOCK REVERSED CENTERED GLENOSPHERE CoCr 10° TILT Ø36 mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Humelock II Cemented Reversible Shoulder (23)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03701037300244), received between Sep 30, 2021 and Feb 5, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Premature Separation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 1 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Premature Separation1

Patient problems

  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 5, 2024Premature Separation; Premature Separation

    REVISION OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, WHICH OCCURRED IN (B)(6) 2018. THE PRIMARY USAGE FORM WAS NOT ABLE TO BE LOCATED, AS THE PRODUCT WAS DISTRIBUTED THROUGH ANOTHER VENDOR. NO FALL OR OTHER TRAUMA REPORTED. THE CAUSE FOR THE REVISION WAS THE GLENOSPHERE DISASSOCIATING WITH THE BASEPLATE, SEEMINGLY OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME. SURGEON NOTES INDICATE MOBILITY AND RANGE OF MOTION HAD BEEN COMPROMISED. 36 MM CENTERED GLENOSPHERE AND 36 MM + 6 STANDARD HUMERAL CUP WERE EXPLANTED; THE INCLUDED PART NUMBERS ARE LIKELY BUT NOT ABSOLUTE AS NO PRIMARY USAGE FORM COULD BE OBTAINED. THESE PARTS WERE REPLACED WITH A 36 MM ECCENTRIC GLENOSPHERE, AND 36 MM + 6 HUMERAL STABILITY CUP.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 18643926 ↗
  • InjurySep 30, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE EVENT WAS A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO INFECTION THAT OCCURED APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE PRIMARY SURGERY USED THE HUMELOCK II REVERSED SYSTEM. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE 135/145 Ø36/+3 HUMERAL CUP AND THE Ø36 CENTERED GLENOSPHERE. THEN, HE IMPLANTED A 135/145 Ø36/+9 HUMERAL CUP AND A Ø36 ECCENTRIC GLENOSPHERE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 12554126 ↗

Other Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices

All Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page