Skip to content

Humelock II Cemented Reversible Shoulder 105-4011Recalls & reported problems

Fx Solutions · HUMELOCK REVERSED ECCENTRIC GLENOSPHERE W/ SCREW CoCr/TA6V 10° TILT Ø40 mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Humelock II Cemented Reversible Shoulder (23)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03701037300312), received between Jul 19, 2021 and May 16, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 16, 2025Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    REVISION OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY 16 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY, WHICH OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2023. NO FALL OR OTHER TRAUMA REPORTED. REVISION OCCURRED DUE TO LOOSENING OF THE GLENOSPHERE. 40 MM ECCENTRIC GLENOSPHERE EXPLANTED AND REPLACED WITH A 36 MM CENTERED GLENOSPHERE. NOTE THAT THIS IS CONTRARY TO THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE, WHICH STATES THAT THE GLENOSPHERE AND HUMERAL CUP SHOULD BE OF THE SAME DIAMETER.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 22039759 ↗
  • InjurySep 1, 2021Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE EVENT TOOK PLACE OUTSIDE OF THE UNITED STATES (IN (B)(6)) AND WAS ASSOCIATED WITH A PRODUCT THAT IS ALSO CLEARED FOR THE MARKET WITHIN THE UNITED STATES.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12405574 ↗
  • InjuryJul 19, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection

    THE EVENT WAS A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO ANCHOR BASE LOOSENING THAT OCCURED APPROXIMATELY 7 MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE Ø38 ANCHOR BASE, THE Ø40 ECCENTRIC GLENOSPHERE AND THE Ø40/+6 HUMERAL CUP. THEN HE IMPLANTED A NEW Ø40 ECCENTRIC GLENOSPHERE, A SIZE 14 CEMENTLESS STEM AND A Ø40/+9 HUMERAL CUP.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 12188100 ↗

Other Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices

All Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page