Skip to content

Humelock II Cemented Reversible Shoulder 313-0706Recalls & reported problems

Fx Solutions · HUMERAL CUP 135/145° STANDARD PE/TA6V Ø36 +6 · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Humelock II Cemented Reversible Shoulder (23)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
21
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
21
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 21 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03701037301364), received between Feb 23, 2021 and May 5, 2026 — classified as 21 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (5 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available11
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated5
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component3
  • Unstable3
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection2

Patient problems

  • Insufficient Information7
  • Failure of Implant4
  • Joint Dislocation4
  • Medical device site infection2
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Subluxation1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 21 most recent of 21 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 5, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO AN INFECTION ON (B)(6) 2026. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2026. A CUP WAS EXPLANTED. A CUP WAS IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25079583 ↗
  • InjuryNov 27, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO AN INFECTION ON (B)(6) 2024. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2024. A CUP AND A GLENOSPHERE WERE EXPLANTED. A CUP AND A GLENOSPHERE WERE IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 20793863 ↗
  • InjuryMay 29, 2023Unstable; Unstable

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO DISLOCATION ON (B)(6) 2023. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2023. A CUP WAS EXPLANTED. A CUP WAS IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Subluxation

    MAUDE report 17016400 ↗
  • InjuryDec 2, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO A DIS-ASSOCIATION ON (B)(6) 2022. THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS IN (B)(6) 2022. A CUP WAS EXPLANTED. A NEW CUP WAS IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 15904824 ↗
  • InjuryAug 3, 2022Unstable

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO INSTABILITY, APPROXIMATELY 1170 DAYS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED 1 HUMERAL CUP 36+6. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED 1 REVERSED ADAPTER AND 1 HUMERAL CUP 36+9.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 15155495 ↗
  • InjuryJul 7, 2022Unstable

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO INSTABILITY ON (B)(6) 2022, FOLLOWING THE PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE HUMERAL CUP (36/6) AND IMPLANTED A HUMERAL CUP (36/9) AND A REVERSED ADAPTER.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 14944805 ↗
  • InjuryApr 8, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022 FOLLOWING THE PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017 DUE TO DISLOCATION. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED A STANDARD HUMERAL CUP (36/6) AND IMPLANTED A STABILITY HUMERAL CUP (36/6).

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 14056687 ↗
  • InjuryApr 4, 2022Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO DISLOCATION. APPROXIMATELY 15 DAYS AFTER THE LAST SURGERY AND 36 DAYS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED 1 HUMERAL CUP 135/1445° Ø36+6 AND 1 CENTERED GLENOSPHERE. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED 1 CENTERED GLENOSPHERE AND 1 HUMERAL CUP 135/145° Ø36+6.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 13994720 ↗
  • InjuryApr 4, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO INFECTION. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED 1 HUMERAL CUP 135/145° Ø36+6 AND 1 CENTERED GLENOSPHERE. THE SURGEON IMPLANTED 1 CENTERED GLENOSPHERE AND 1 HUMERAL CUP 135/145 Ø36+6.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 13994621 ↗
  • InjuryApr 4, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO DISLOCATION. APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS AND 9 MONTHS AFTER THE FIRST SURGERY. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED 1 HUMERAL CUP (36/6). THE SURGEON IMPLANTED 1 HUMERAL CUP (36/6).

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 13994453 ↗
  • InjuryJan 31, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021, APPROXIMATELY 04 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE CAUSE FOR REVISION IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE STANDARD HUMERAL CUP (36/6) AND IMPLANTED A STABILITY HUMERAL CUP (36/9).

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13391274 ↗
  • InjuryJan 5, 2022Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021, APPROXIMATELY 3 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021 AS THE HUMERAL CUP GOT DISENGAGED FROM THE HUMERIS STEM. THE DISENGAGED HUMERAL CUP (36/6) WAS EXPLANTED AND A NEW HUMERAL CUP (36/6) WAS IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 13167522 ↗
  • InjuryJan 4, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021, APPROXIMATELY 04 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE CAUSE FOR REVISION IS UNKNOWN. THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE STANDARD HUMERAL CUP (36/6) AND IMPLANTED A STABILITY HUMERAL CUP (36/9).

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13158525 ↗
  • InjuryDec 10, 2021Detachment of Device or Device Component; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021, APPROXIMATELY 3 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021 AS THE HUMERAL CUP GOT DISENGAGED FROM THE HUMERIS STEM. THE DISENGAGED HUMERAL CUP (36/6) WAS EXPLANTED AND A NEW HUMERAL CUP (36/6) WAS IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12980855 ↗
  • InjuryOct 8, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THIS EVENT WAS A REVISION FOR DISLOCATION. APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE PRIMARY SURGERY USED THE HUMELOCK II REVERSED SYSTEM. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON EXPANTED THE Ø 36+6 135/145 HUMERAL CUP. THEN, HE IMPLANTED Ø 36+6 STABILITY HUMERAL CUP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 12598099 ↗
  • InjuryAug 30, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE EVENT WAS A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO DISLOCATION THAT OCCURED APPROXIMATELY 3 WEEKS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE PRIMARY SURGERY USED THE HUMERIS REVERSED SYSTEM. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE Ø36/+3 135/145 HUMERAL CUP AND REPLACED IT BY A Ø36/+9 135/145 HUMERAL CUP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 12382652 ↗
  • InjuryAug 9, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE EVENT WAS A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO DISLOCATION THAT OCCURED APPROXIMATELY ONE MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE PRIMARY SURGERY USED THE HUMELOCK II REVERSED SYSTEM. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE Ø36/+6 135/145 HUMERAL CUP AND REPLACED IT BY A Ø36/+6 135/145 STABILITY HUMERAL CUP.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation

    MAUDE report 12292511 ↗
  • InjuryMay 27, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE EVENT WAS A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO DISLOCATION THAT OCCURED APPROXIMATELY 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE PRIMAR SURGERY USED THE HUMELOCK II REVERSED SYSTEM. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE Ø36 CENTERED GLENOSHERE AND THE 135/145 Ø36/+6 HUMERAL CUP. THEN HE IMPLANTED Ø40 ECCENTRIC GLENOSHERE AND A 135/145 Ø40/+9 HUMERAL CUP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11892145 ↗
  • InjuryMay 27, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE EVENT WAS A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO LOOSENING THAT OCCURED APPROXIMATELY 4 YEARS AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY. THE PRIMARY SURGERY USED THE HUMELOCK II REVERSED SYSTEM. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE SURGEON EXPLANTED THE Ø36/+6 HUMERAL CUP. HE IMPLANTED MEDICAL DEVICES FROM A COMPETING COMPANY.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11892143 ↗
  • InjuryMar 30, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    PATIENT REVISED ON (B)(6) 2021 DUE TO INSTABILITY, APPROXIMATELY 2 YEARS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY. SURGEON EXPLANTED THE 135/145 36/+6 HUMERAL CUP AND THEN IMPLANTED A 36/+6 STANDARD HUMERAL CUP AND A 135/145 REVERSED ADAPTER FOR AN EXTRA +9MM OF SPACING.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 11588085 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 23, 2021Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    REVISION FOR DISLOCATION. DURING THE FIRST POSE, PROBLEM WITH THE ANAESTHETIST, SHOULDER TOO RELAXED. THE SURGEON REPLACED THE 36+6 HUMERAL CUP WITH A 36+9 CUP.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11363970 ↗

Other Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices

All Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page