Skip to content

Humelock Reversed Shoulder 317-3614Recalls & reported problems

Fx Solutions · HUMELOCK REVERSED STEM TA6V Ø36/14 CEMENTLESS LOCKABLE Ti/HA · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Humelock Reversed Shoulder (13)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
6
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03701037303757), received between Jan 28, 2022 and May 28, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Medical device site infection3
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Inadequate Osseointegration1
  • Seroma1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 28, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO AN INFECTION ON (B)(6) 2026. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2025. A CUP, A GLENOSPHERE, A GLENOID BASEPLATE, SCREWS AND A STEM WERE EXPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 25317094 ↗
  • InjuryJan 12, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED DUE TO AN INFECTION ON (B)(6) 2026. THE IMPLANTATION DATE WAS ON (B)(6) 2025. A CUP, A GLENOSPHERE, A GLENOID BSAE PLATE, SCREWS AND A STEM WERE EXPLANTED. A CUP, A GLENOSPHERE, A GLENOID BSAE PLATE, SCREWS AND A STEM WERE IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 24034017 ↗
  • InjuryJan 11, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    REVISION OCCURRED APPROXIMATELY 9 MONTHS AFTER PRIMARY SURGERY, WHICH OCCURRED ON (B)(6)2022. REVISION OCCURRED DUE TO INFECTION. THE REVISION WAS A TOTAL EXPLANT OF THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING THE STEM, BASEPLATE, 36 MM CENTERED GLENOSPHERE, 36 MM + 9 STANDARD HUMERAL CUP, AND 4 SCREWS. THIS SYSTEM WAS REPLACED WITH A COMPETITOR'S ANTI-BIOTIC SPACER TO TREAT THE INFECTION. FIRST NOTIFICATION OF THIS REVISION WAS GIVEN BY THE REPRESENTATIVE ON (B)(6) 2023, IN PURSUANCE OF INFORMATION REGARDING A SUBSEQUENT REVISION FOR THE SAME PATIENT, INVOLVING AN EXPLANT OF THE ANTI-BIOTIC SPACER AND A REPLACEMENT OF AN FX SYSTEM.

    Patient problems: Medical device site infection

    MAUDE report 18495830 ↗
  • InjuryNov 21, 2023Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method; Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method

    REVISION WAS PERFORMED APPROXIMATELY 1 MONTH AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY; PRIMARY SURGERY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2023. NO FALL OR OTHER TRAUMA NOTED. PATIENT PRESENTED WITH A LOOSENED STEM WITHIN THE HUMERAL CANAL. 36X14 STEM, 40 MM +3 STABILITY HUMERAL CUP, AND 9 MM SPACER EXPLANTED. THESE PARTS WERE REPLACED WITH A 40X14 STEM, 40 MM + 3 STABILITY HUMERAL CUP, 9 MM SPACER, A 34 MM CORTICAL SCREW, AND A 28 MM CORTICAL SCREW. THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS TREATMENT FOR A FRACTURE. CONTRARY TO THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE FOR THE PRIMARY SURGERY, THE SURGEON DID NOT INCLUDE ANY DISTAL SCREWS, WHICH ALLOWED THE STEM TO LOOSEN. SURGEON STATED THAT ALL FUTURE PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES WILL BE TREATED WITH DISTAL SCREWS.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 18187434 ↗
  • InjuryJun 21, 2022Unstable; Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE PATIENT WAS REVISED ON (B)(6) 2022 DUE TO CHRONIC INSTABILITY LEADING TO DISLOCATION FOLLOWING THE PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. A HUMERAL CUP (36/6), HUMELOCK REVERSED STEM (14), TWO STANDARD SCREWS (20), STANDARD SCREW (25), STANDARD SCREW (35), GLENOSPHERE (36) AND GLENOID BASEPLATE (24) WERE EXPLANTED. A HUMERAL CUP (36/6), HUMERAL SPACER (9), POST EXTENSION (6), THREE STANDARD SCREWS (30), STANDARD SCREW (35), GLENOSPHERE (36) AND GLENOID BASEPLATE (24) WERE IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 14757310 ↗
  • InjuryJan 28, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE PATIENT DEVELOPED SEROMA WHICH LED TO A REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021, APPROXIMATELY A WEEK AFTER THE PRIMARY SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021 TO AVOID INFECTION. ONLY THE HUMERAL CUP (40/9) WAS REPLACED WITH A NEW HUMERAL CUP (40/9).

    Patient problems: Seroma

    MAUDE report 13384811 ↗

Other Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices

All Shoulder Prosthesis, Reverse Configuration devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page