Skip to content

Sophysa SPVB-2010Recalls & reported problems

Sophysa · POLARIS SPVB KIT PREATTACHED/BO19-10 · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03760124131338), received between Jun 28, 2017 and Jun 12, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Component Missing” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Component Missing1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1
  • Obstruction of Flow1

Patient problems

  • Hydrocephalus2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJun 12, 2025Obstruction of Flow; Insufficient Device Problem Information; Obstruction of Flow; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE VALVE WAS REPLACED DURING A SURGERY ON A PATIENT FOR A REASON THAT, APPARENTLY, WAS NOT RELATED TO THE VALVE. ACCORDING TO THE INFORMATION SHARED BY THE PHYSICIAN, THE DOCTOR PREFERS TO REPLACE THE VALVE TO ENSURE THE PATIENT RECEIVES THE BEST VALUE AND CARE. THE DOCTOR ALSO CONFIRMED THAT THE VALVE APPEARED TO BE FUNCTIONING NORMALLY. SINCE WE DO NOT HAVE INFORMATION REGARDING THE REASON FOR THE PROCEDURE, WE HAVE DECIDED TO REPORT THIS CASE.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22194549 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 28, 2017Component Missing; Component Missing

    MISSING COMPONENT: THE VALVE WAS DELIVERED TO (B)(6) WITHOUT THE IFU IN SPANISH, ONLY THE FRENCH/ENGLISH BOOKLET.

    Patient problems: Hydrocephalus

    MAUDE report 6673169 ↗

Other Shunt, central nervous system and components devices

All Shunt, central nervous system and components devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page