Skip to content

SpineJack 0909200050Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · EXPANSION KIT 5.0MM · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03760253800471), received between Oct 20, 2022 and Oct 28, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Separation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 1 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult or Delayed Separation3
  • Separation Failure3
  • Activation Failure1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque1
  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 28, 2025Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    THIS RECORD IS A CONSOLIDATION OF RECORDS SUMMARIZED AS A PART OF THE FDA VOLUNTARY MALFUNCTION SUMMARY REPORTING PROGRAM. EVENTS OCCURRED BETWEEN JULY 1 ¿ SEPTEMBER 30, 2025. THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES 1 EVENT FOR THE FAILURE: DIFFICULT OR DELAYED SEPARATION. - 1 EVENT HAD NO HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OR IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23399811 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 24, 2025Separation Failure; Activation Failure; Separation Failure; Activation Failure

    THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES 1 EVENT FOR THE FAILURES: ACTIVATION FAILURE; SEPARATION FAILURE. 1 EVENT HAD NO HEALTH CONSEQUENCES OR IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22587122 ↗
  • InjuryJun 9, 2025Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Separation Failure; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A BIPEDICULAR SPINEJACK PLACEMENT AT L2 FOLLOWING A TUMOR ABLATION, ONE OF THE IMPLANTS WOULD NOT RELEASE FROM THE RELEASE ROD. THE SURGEON INITIALLY ATTEMPTED TO OBTAIN A STRONGER GRIP ON THE RELEASE ROD BY USING A HEMOSTAT OR KOCHER, AS WELL AS VISE GRIPS, AND THEN MALLETING UP FROM UNDERNEATH; THE BLUE HANDLE OF THE RELEASE ROD CAME OFF. THE SURGEON THEN INJECTED CEMENT TO STABILIZE THE SYSTEM. AFTER THE CEMENT HAD HARDENED, RELEASE WAS ATTEMPTED AGAIN, WITHOUT SUCCESS. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AFTER A 2-HOUR DELAY WHEN THE SURGEON CUT THE RELEASE ROD OFF AT THE PEDICLE. NO OTHER MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED, NO ADDITIONAL TREATMENT IS EXPECTED, AND THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 22167812 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 22, 2025Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES 1 MALFUNCTION EVENT IN WHICH THE DEVICE REPORTEDLY HAD DIFFICULT OR DELAYED SEPARATION. - 1 EVENT HAD PATIENT INVOLVEMENT, NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21207621 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 26, 2023Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES 2 MALFUNCTION EVENTS IN WHICH THE DEVICE REPORTEDLY HAD DIFFICULT OR DELAYED SEPARATION. - 2 EVENTS HAD PATIENT INVOLVEMENT; NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17401944 ↗
  • InjuryOct 20, 2022Separation Failure; Separation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A VERTEBROPLASTY PROCEDURE AT T11, A SPINEJACK IMPLANT WAS BEING MANIPULATED BY THE SURGEON. THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED TO REMOVE THE SPINEJACK IMPLANT, RESISTANCE WAS NOTED, AND THE SURGEON STOPPED. UPON REMOVAL OF THE EXPANDER TUBE, IT WAS FOUND THE IMPLANT HAD RELEASED SUBCUTANEOUSLY IN THE PATIENT TISSUE, AND IT WAS NOTED THERE WAS NO EXTRAVASATION OF CEMENT. THE SURGEON MADE A LARGER INCISION AND SURGICALLY REMOVED THE IMPLANT FROM THE PATIENT TISSUE. NO CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DELAY OCCURRED, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THE CEMENT FILL WAS REPORTED TO BE ADEQUATE IN THE VERTEBROPLASTY, AND NO ADDITIONAL FOLLOW UP OR MEDICAL INTERVENTION HAS BEEN INDICATED.

    Patient problems: Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque

    MAUDE report 15640453 ↗

Other Cement, Bone, Vertebroplasty devices

All Cement, Bone, Vertebroplasty devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page