Skip to content

SpineJack 0909200042Recalls & reported problems

Stryker Corporation · EXPANSION KIT 4.2MM · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 03760253800488), received between Jan 25, 2023 and May 5, 2026 — classified as 4 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult or Delayed Separation” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Difficult or Delayed Separation3
  • Migration1
  • Separation Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMay 5, 2026Separation Failure

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WAS UNDERGOING MULTI-LEVEL TREATMENT FOR A VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE. AT L1, THE IMPLANT ON THE RIGHT SIDE WAS UNABLE TO DETACH FROM THE EXPANDER TUBE OF THE EXPANSION KIT. AFTER ATTEMPTS AT REMOVAL FAILED, ORTHO WAS CONSULTED AND THE EXPANDER TUBE AND WORKING CANNULA WERE CUT DOWN AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE TO THE BONE. AS A RESULT, THE OTHER LEVEL OF THE PROCEDURE WAS NOT COMPLETED. TOTAL DELAY IN CASE WAS APPROXIMATELY 150 MINUTES. NO FURTHER ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WERE REPORTED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 25079954 ↗
  • InjuryJun 14, 2023Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN L1 KYPHOPLASTY UTILIZING SPINEJACK, THE CANNULA WOULD NOT DETACH FROM SPINEJACK PRIOR TO INJECTING CEMENT. THE PHYSICIAN USED ADDITIONAL INSTRUMENTATION TO DETACH THE IMPLANT. HEIGHT RESTORATION WAS ACHIEVED, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITHOUT A CLINICALLY-SIGNIFICANT DELAY, AND NO ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES HAVE BEEN REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 17124171 ↗
  • InjuryApr 25, 2023Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A STANDARD POST-OP X-RAY FOLLOWING A BIPEDICULAR T5 KYPHOPLASTY, THE IMPLANT HAD ESCAPED THE VERTEBRAL BODY. NO DELAY, MEDICAL INTERVENTION, OR ADDITIONAL ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES HAVE BEEN REPORTED. ADDITIONAL MEDICAL FOLLOW-UP IS NOT EXPECTED AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16808931 ↗
  • MalfunctionApr 24, 2023Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    THIS REPORT SUMMARIZES 2 MALFUNCTION EVENTS IN WHICH THE DEVICE REPORTEDLY HAD DIFFICULT OR DELAYED SEPARATION. 2 EVENTS HAD PATIENT INVOLVEMENT; NO PATIENT IMPACT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16802923 ↗
  • InjuryJan 25, 2023Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult or Delayed Separation

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT AT THE END OF A PROCEDURE INVOLVING ABLATION OF THE PATIENT'S TUMOR AND IMPLANTATION OF SPINEJACK AT THE TUMOR LOCATION, THE PHYSICIAN HAD DIFFICULTY SEPARATING THE EXPANDER TUBE FROM THE DEPLOYED SPINEJACK IMPLANT. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO DETACH THE EXPANDER TUBE BY PULLING THE IMPLANT BACK TOWARDS THE PATIENT'S PEDICLE AND THEN USED A TROCAR TO PUSH THE SPINEJACK IMPLANT AND CEMENT BACK INTO THE VERTEBRAL BODY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY WITH A 25-30 MINUTE DELAY AND NO ADDITIONAL MEDICAL INTERVENTION OR ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES HAVE BEEN REPORTED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16241590 ↗

Other Cement, Bone, Vertebroplasty devices

All Cement, Bone, Vertebroplasty devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.