Skip to content

Alanine Aminotransferase acc. to IFCC without pyridoxal phosphate activation 20764957322Recalls & reported problems

Roche Diagnostics GmbH · Class 1

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
6
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 6 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04015630913862), received between Jul 21, 2021 and Dec 8, 2025 — classified as 6 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 1 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 1 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings2
  • Non Reproducible Results2
  • Low Test Results1
  • Unable to Obtain Readings1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions6

Recent adverse event reports

The 6 most recent of 6 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 8, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    THERE WAS AN ALLEGATION OF QUESTIONABLE ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE ACC. TO IFCC WITHOUT PYRIDOXAL PHOSPHATE ACTIVATION (ALT) RESULTS FOR 2 PATIENT SAMPLES ON A COBAS 4000 C311 STAND ALONE SYSTEM AND A COBAS PURE ANALYZER. ON 21-OCT-2025, SAMPLE 1 HAD AN INITIAL ALT RESULT OF 52 IU/L FROM THE COBAS PURE ANALYZER. THE SAMPLE WAS ALSO TESTED ON A C 311 ANALYZER AND THE RESULT WAS 24 IU/L. THE EXACT DATE OF TESTING ON THE C 311 ANALYZER WAS NOT PROVIDED. SAMPLE 2 HAD AN INITIAL ALT RESULT OF 51.2 IU/L FROM THE COBAS PURE ANALYZER. THE SAMPLE WAS ALSO TESTED ON A C 311 ANALYZER AND THE RESULT WAS 21.8 IU/L. THE EXACT DATES OF TESTING WERE NOT PROVIDED.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23744730 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 30, 2025Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings; Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings

    THERE WAS AN ALLEGATION OF A QUESTIONABLE ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE ACC. TO IFCC WITHOUT PYRIDOXAL PHOSPHATE ACTIVATION RESULT FROM THE COBAS 6000 C501 MODULE, SUSPECTING A NEGATIVE INTERFERENCE. THE INITIAL RESULT WAS 67.3 U/L, ACCOMPANIED BY A DATA FLAG, WITH A REPEAT RESULT OF 97.6 U/L, ALSO ACCOMPANIED BY A DATA FLAG. AFTER THE SAMPLE WAS DILUTED, THE DATA FLAG DID NOT OCCUR, HOWEVER, THIS RESULT WAS NOT REPRODUCIBLE ON REPEAT TESTING ON DIFFERENT ANALYZERS.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22116026 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 23, 2024Non Reproducible Results; Non Reproducible Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER STATED THEY RECEIVED DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED WITH ASTL AND ALTL ON AN INTEGRA 400 PLUS SYSTEM. THE CUSTOMER NOTED THAT THE PATIENT SAMPLE WAS ICTERIC. THIS MEDWATCH WILL APPLY TO THE ALT ASSAY. PLEASE REFER TO THE MEDWATCH WITH A1. PATIENT IDENTIFIER PT-0066446 FOR INFORMATION RELATED TO THE AST ASSAY. THE SAMPLE INITIALLY RESULTED IN AN AST VALUE OF 77 U/L WITH A DATA FLAG. THE SAMPLE WAS REPEATED TWICE, RESULTING IN AST VALUES OF 279 U/L WITH A DATA FLAG AND 715 U/L WITH A DATA FLAG. THE SAMPLE WAS PLACED IN A CUP AND REPEATED TWICE, RESULTING IN AST VALUES OF 731 U/L WITH A DATA FLAG AND 732 U/L WITH A DATA FLAG. THE SAMPLE INITIALLY RESULTED IN AN ALT VALUE OF 36 U/L WITH A DATA FLAG AND IT REPEATED AS 1027 U/L WITH A DATA FLAG. THE SAMPLE WAS PLACED IN A CUP AND REPEATED TWICE, RESULTING IN ALT VALUES OF 1044 U/L WITH A DATA FLAG AND 1063 U/L WITH A DATA FLAG.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 18564149 ↗
  • MalfunctionFeb 8, 2023Non Reproducible Results; Non Reproducible Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER RECEIVED A QUESTIONABLE ALTL ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE ACC. TO IFCC WITHOUT PYRIDOXAL PHOSPHATE ACTIVATION (ALTL) RESULT FROM ONE PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED ON THE COBAS 6000 C501 MODULE. THE INITIAL RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT WHICH REQUESTED VERIFICATION. A RERUN WAS PERFORMED ON THE REPORTED MODULE AND THEIR OTHER C 501 MODULE. THE INITIAL RESULT FROM THE MODULE WAS 363.9 U/L. THE FIRST REPEAT RESULT FROM THE MODULE WAS 17.8 U/L. THE SECOND REPEAT RESULT FROM THE OTHER MODULE WAS 18.1 U/L. THE REPEAT RESULT FROM THE OTHER MODULE CONFIRMED THE RESULT. THE REAGENT LOT NUMBER IS 67320501. THE EXPIRATION DATE IS 31-JAN-2024.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16327237 ↗
  • MalfunctionJan 14, 2022Unable to Obtain Readings; Unable to Obtain Readings

    THE INITIAL REPORTER RECEIVED A QUESTIONABLE ALTL ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE ACC. TO IFCC WITHOUT PYRIDOXAL PHOSPHATE ACTIVATION RESULT FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE WITH A COBAS 8000 C702 MODULE. THE REPORTER STATED THEY WERE HAVING ISSUES OBTAINING VALID VALUES DUE TO FLAGGING ON THIS SPECIFIC PATIENT SAMPLE AND SUSPECTED AN INTERFERENCE. THE REPORTER PROVIDED THE FOLLOWING RESULTS WITHOUT ANY FLAGGING: THE INITIAL RESULT WAS 18 U/L. THE REPEATED RESULT WAS 28.5 U/L. THE SECOND REPEATED RESULT WAS 28.4 U/L. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE QUESTIONABLE RESULT WAS REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 13259429 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 21, 2021Low Test Results; Low Test Results

    THE INITIAL REPORTER COMPLAINED OF DISCREPANT LOW RESULTS FOR 2 PATIENT SAMPLES TESTED FOR ALTL ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE ACC. TO IFCC WITHOUT PYRIDOXAL PHOSPHATE ACTIVATION (ALTL) ON A COBAS 4000 C (311) STAND ALONE SYSTEM COMPARED TO THE SIEMENS DIMENSION RXL MAX METHOD. "PATIENT 2" INITIAL RESULT FROM THE C311 SYSTEM WAS 6.1 U/L. THE RESULT FROM THE SIEMENS METHOD WAS 22 U/L. ON (B)(6) 2021 "PATIENT 3" INITIAL RESULT FROM THE C311 SYSTEM WAS 20.1 U/L. THE RESULT FROM THE SIEMENS METHOD WAS 32 U/L. NO QUESTIONABLE RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THE C311 ANALYZER SERIAL NUMBER WAS (B)(4).

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 12206198 ↗

Other NADH OXIDATION/NAD REDUCTION, ALT/SGPT devices

All NADH OXIDATION/NAD REDUCTION, ALT/SGPT devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page