Skip to content

Tinaquant Lipoprotein a Gen.2 5852625190Recalls & reported problems

Roche Diagnostics GmbH · Class 2

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 04015630929962), received between Dec 13, 2024 and Dec 13, 2024 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Non Reproducible Results” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 1 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Non Reproducible Results1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionDec 13, 2024Non Reproducible Results; Non Reproducible Results

    WE RECEIVED AN ALLEGATION ABOUT DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR 3 PATIENTS' SAMPLES TESTED WITH TINA-QUANT LIPOPROTEIN (A) GEN.2 (LPA2) ASSAY ON A COBAS C503 ANALYTICAL UNIT WHEN COMPARED TO A DIFFERENT ANALYTICAL UNIT. SAMPLE 2 AND SAMPLE 3 WERE PLASMA SAMPLES. SAMPLE 1 (PATIENT 1): INITIAL RESULT: 86 MG/DL (ACCOMPANIED BY A DATA FLAG AND TESTED ON THE ORIGINAL C503). 1ST REPEAT RESULT: 31 MG/DL (TESTED ON THE ORIGINAL C503 WITH 3 TIMES DILUTION). 2ND AND 3RD REPEAT RESULTS WERE BOTH 19 MG/DL (TESTED ON ANOTHER ANALYTICAL UNIT). 4TH AND 5TH REPEAT RESULTS WERE BOTH 19 MG/DL (TESTED ON THE ORIGINAL C503). SAMPLE 2 (PATIENT 2) WAS TESTED ON (B)(6)2024: INITIAL RESULT: 39 MG/DL (TESTED ON THE ORIGINAL C503). 1ST REPEAT RESULT: 49 MG/DL (TESTED ON THE ORIGINAL C503). 2ND AND 3RD REPEAT RESULTS WERE BOTH 16 MG/DL (TESTED ON ANOTHER ANALYTICAL UNIT). 4TH REPEAT RESULT: 16 MG/DL (TESTED ON THE ORIGINAL C503). 5TH REPEAT RESULT: 17 MG/DL (TESTED ON THE ORIGINAL C503). SAMPLE 3 (PATIENT 3) WAS TESTED ON (B)(6)2024: INITIAL RESULT: 55 MG/DL (TESTED ON THE ORIGINAL C503). 1ST REPEAT RESULT: 42 MG/DL (TESTED ON THE ORIGINAL C503). 2ND REPEAT RESULT: 28 MG/DL (TESTED ON ANOTHER ANALYTICAL UNIT). 3RD RE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20928443 ↗

Other LIPOPROTEIN, LOW-DENSITY, ANTIGEN, ANTISERUM, CONTROL devices

All LIPOPROTEIN, LOW-DENSITY, ANTIGEN, ANTISERUM, CONTROL devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page