Elecsys CMV IgG 07027117190Recalls & reported problems
Roche Diagnostics GmbH · Class 2
All models of Elecsys CMV IgG (2)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04015630940172), received between Aug 23, 2021 and Sep 16, 2025 — classified as 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Low Test Results” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Low Test Results5
- False Negative Result2
- High Test Results2
- False Positive Result1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions8
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionSep 16, 2025False Negative Result; False Positive Result; False Negative Result; False Positive Result
1. DESCRIBE THE EVENT: THE INITIAL REPORTER COMPLAINED OF DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR TWO PATIENTS TESTED WITH ELECSYS CMV IGG ON A COBAS E 801 MODULE. 2. PATIENT AGE RANGE: ASKU 3. PATIENT WEIGHT RANGE: ASKU 4. PATIENT SEX BREAKDOWN: ASKU 5. PATIENT RACE BREAKDOWN: ASKU. 6. PATIENT ETHNICITY BREAKDOWN: ASKU.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23066012 ↗MalfunctionMar 9, 2023False Negative Result; False Negative Result
THE INITIAL REPORTER QUESTIONED NEGATIVE RESULTS FOR 1 PATIENT TESTED FOR ELECSYS CMV IGG (CMV IGG) AND ELECSYS CMV IGM (CMV IGM) ON A COBAS E 801 MODULE. THIS MEDWATCH WILL COVER CMV IGG. REFER TO MEDWATCH WITH PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6) FOR INFORMATION ON THE CMV IGM RESULTS. THE INITIAL CMV IGG RESULT FROM THE E801 MODULE WAS 0.180 U/ML (NEGATIVE). THE INITIAL CMV IGM RESULT FROM THE E801 MODULE WAS 0.239 COI (NEGATIVE). THE INITIAL RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THE PATIENT WENT TO ANOTHER HOSPITAL. A NEW SAMPLE WAS OBTAINED AND THE CMV IGG AND CMV IGM RESULTS FROM THE CHORUS DIESSE METHOD WERE BOTH POSITIVE (THE ACTUAL RESULTS WERE NOT PROVIDED). THE ORIGINAL SAMPLE WAS SENT TO AN EXTERNAL LABORATORY FOR TESTING BY THE DIASORIN LIASON METHOD AND THE CMV IGG RESULT WAS 16.7 U/ML (POSITIVE) AND THE CMV IGM RESULT WAS 80.3 COI (POSITIVE). ON (B)(6)2023 THE CUSTOMER REPEATED THE ORIGINAL SAMPLE ON THE E801 MODULE AND THE CMV IGG RESULT WAS 0.181 U/ML (NEGATIVE) AND THE CMV IGM RESULT WAS 0.240 COI (NEGATIVE). ON (B)(6)2023 THE ORIGINAL SAMPLE WAS AGAIN REPEATED BY THE CUSTOMER WITH A CMV IGG RESULT OF 0.204 U/ML (NEGATIVE) AND A CMV IGM RESULT OF 0.241 COI (NEGATI
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16516346 ↗MalfunctionJun 15, 2022Low Test Results; Low Test Results
THE INITIAL REPORTER STATED THEY RECEIVED DISCREPANT RESULTS FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED WITH THE ELECSYS CMV IGG ASSAY ON A COBAS 8000 E 801 MODULE (SERIAL NUMBER (B)(4)). THE SAMPLE RESULTED IN A CMV IGG VALUE OF 0.31 U/ML (NON-REACTIVE) WHEN TESTED ON THE E 801 ANALYZER. THE VALUE FROM THE E 801 ANALYZER WAS REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. AN ALIQUOT OF THIS SAMPLE WAS SENT TO ANOTHER LABORATORY FOR TESTING USING THE DIASORIN LIAISON XL METHOD, RESULTING IN A VALUE OF 104 U/ML (IMMUNE/REACTIVE).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14694060 ↗MalfunctionApr 26, 2022High Test Results; Low Test Results; High Test Results; Low Test Results
THE INITIAL REPORTER RECEIVED QUESTIONABLE ELECSYS CMV IGG RESULTS FOR ONE PATIENT TESTED ON A COBAS 8000 E 801 MODULE SERIAL NUMBER (B)(4). THE PATIENT HAD TWO SAMPLES COLLECTED. THE PATIENT'S ELECSYS CMV IGG RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUTSIDE THE LABORATORY. THE PATIENT'S SAMPLES WERE REPEATED ON A VIDAS ANALYZER AND A LIAISON ANALYZER. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT'S FIRST SAMPLE WAS COLLECTED. THE PATIENT'S ELECSYS CMV IGG RESULT WAS 2.5 U/ML POSITIVE. THE PATIENT'S VIDAS CMV IGG RESULT WAS 0.135 UA/ML NEGATIVE. ON (B)(6) 2022, THE PATIENT'S SECOND SAMPLE WAS COLLECTED. THE PATIENT'S ELECSYS CMV IGG RESULT WAS "<1" U/ML NEGATIVE. THE PATIENT'S VIDAS CMV IGG RESULT WAS 19 UA/ML POSITIVE. THE PATIENT'S LIAISON CMV IGG RESULT WAS 63 U/ML POSITIVE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14208719 ↗MalfunctionNov 23, 2021Low Test Results; Low Test Results
THE INITIAL REPORTER STATED THEY RECEIVED A QUESTIONABLE RESULT FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE TESTED WITH THE ELECSYS CMV IGG ASSAY ON A COBAS 8000 E 801 MODULE. IT WAS ASKED, BUT IT IS NOT KNOWN IF ANY INCORRECT RESULTS WERE REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY. THE SAMPLE RESULTED IN A (B)(6) IGG VALUE OF (B)(6) COI ((B)(6) ACCOMPANIED BY A DATA FLAG. THE SAMPLE WAS TESTED ON AN ABBOTT ARCHITECT ANALYZER, RESULTING IN A (B)(6) IGG VALUE THAT WAS 16 TIMES THE CUTOFF VALUE. THE REPORTER STATED THAT (B)(6) INFECTION OF THE PATIENT IS COMPATIBLE WITH THE PATIENT'S CLINICAL PICTURE. THE SERIAL NUMBER OF THE E801 ANALYZER IS (B)(4).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12860026 ↗MalfunctionNov 11, 2021High Test Results; High Test Results
THE INITIAL REPORTER RECEIVED A QUESTIONABLE ELECSYS CMV IGG RESULT FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE WITH COBAS E 801 MODULE (B)(4). THE INITIAL RESULT WAS 1.20 U/ML (REACTIVE). THIS RESULT WAS REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY AND QUESTIONED BY THE DOCTOR. ON (B)(6) 2021, THE SAMPLE WAS TESTED IN ANOTHER LABORATORY ON AN UNKNOWN ANALYZER WITH A RESULT OF NEGATIVE (NON-REACTIVE).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12793606 ↗MalfunctionSep 9, 2021Low Test Results; Low Test Results
THE INITIAL REPORTER RECEIVED (B)(6) ELECSYS CMV IGG RESULTS FOR ONE PATIENT SAMPLE WITH THE COBAS E 801 MODULE SERIAL NUMBER (B)(4). ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT¿S ELECSYS RESULT WAS (B)(6). ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT¿S ELECSYS RESULT ON A SECOND SAMPLE WAS (B)(6). ON (B)(6) 2021, THE PATIENT¿S ELECSYS RESULT ON A THIRD SAMPLE WAS (B)(6). REPETITION USING THE ELECSYS, THE SAMPLE WAS (B)(6). REPETITION USING A VIDAS ANALYZER AT THE CUSTOMER¿S SITE, THE SAMPLE WAS (B)(6). IN ANOTHER LABORATORY WITH AN UNKNOWN METHOD, THE SAMPLE WAS (B)(6). THE (B)(6) RESULT WAS REPORTED TO THE PATIENT. IT IS UNKNOWN WHICH OF THE SAMPLES WAS TESTED IN THE OTHER LABORATORY OR USED FOR REPETITION TESTING.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12447512 ↗MalfunctionAug 23, 2021Low Test Results; Low Test Results
THERE WAS AN ALLEGATION OF A QUESTIONABLE CMV IGG ELECSYS RESULT FROM COBAS E 801 MODULE SERIAL NUMBER (B)(4). THE INITIAL RESULT WAS <0.25 UI/ML(NEGATIVE). THE SAMPLE WAS SENT TO ANOTHER LABORATORY AND TESTED BY DIASORIN METHOD WITH A RESULT OF 28.9 UI/ML (POSITIVE). ON (B)(6) 2021, THE SAME SAMPLE WAS RETESTED ON ANOTHER COBAS ANALYZER AND THE RESULT WAS <0.25 (NEGATIVE). THE QUESTIONABLE RESULTS WERE NOT REPORTED OUTSIDE OF THE LABORATORY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12355709 ↗
Other ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORBENT ASSAY, CYTOMEGALOVIRUS devices
- Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. 25178Bio-RAD Laboratories, Inc. · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORBENT ASSAY, CYTOMEGALOVIRUS1 recall0 reports
- Elecsys CMV IgG 09118551190Roche Diagnostics GmbH · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORBENT ASSAY, CYTOMEGALOVIRUS43 reports
- Elecsys CMV IgM 07027133190Roche Diagnostics GmbH · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORBENT ASSAY, CYTOMEGALOVIRUS22 reports
- IMMULITE® 2000 Systems CVG CMV IgG 10381309Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products Ltd · ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOABSORBENT ASSAY, CYTOMEGALOVIRUS6 reports
- VIDAS® CMV IgG 30204-01Biomerieux SA · Enzyme Linked Immunoabsorbent Assay, Cytomegalovirus3 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page