LinkSymphoKnee 880-217/10Recalls & reported problems
WALDEMAR LINK GmbH & Co. KG · Articulating Surfaces, PS · Class 2 · Implant
All models of LinkSymphoKnee (117)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04026575253265), received between Jun 1, 2023 and Jun 1, 2023 — classified as 4 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Positioning Failure” (4 reports).
11 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K202924); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Positioning Failure4
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 1, 2023Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
LB WAS NOTIFIED ON (B)(6) 2022 BY J.B / T. R.: "AFTER ATTEMPTING TO IMPACT THE FINAL POLY SPACER, IT APPEARED TO HAVE BEEN LOCKED IN PLACE, BUT IN REDUCING THE KNEE INTO EXTENSION, THE POLY SEEMED DISASSOCIATED POSTERIOR FROM TIBIA IMPLANT (LOT # 1949231). THE SURGEON THEN REMOVED THE POLY AND REQUESTED A SECOND ONE (LOT # 1949232). WITH THE SECOND POLY AFTER APPEARED TO NOT LOCK IN THE BACK AFTER IMPACTING, THE SURGEON REQUESTED A THIRD POLY. AFTER CLEANING OUT SOFT TISSUE AND PLACING THE KNEE IN DEEP FLEXION, THE POLY LOCKED IN PLACE. AFTER CLOSING THE PATIENT AND PERFORMING ROM THE KNEE APPEARED TO BE STABLE AND THE SURGEON APPEARED TO BE SATISFIED WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE KNEE. THE PROCESSED ADDED ONLY A COUPLE OF MINUTES TO THE ENTIRE CASE." [CUSTOMER].
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17043573 ↗MalfunctionJun 1, 2023Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
POSITIONING FAILURE OF ARTICULATING SURFACE IN THE TIBIAL COMPONENT. A DIFFERENT ARTICULATING SURFACE WAS USED INSTEAD. [CUSTOMER].
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17040314 ↗MalfunctionJun 1, 2023Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
LB WAS NOTIFIED ON 2022-05-17 BY (B)(6).: "AFTER ATTEMPTING TO IMPACT THE FINAL POLY SPACER, IT APPEARED TO HAVE BEEN LOCKED IN PLACE, BUT IN REDUCING THE KNEE INTO EXTENSION, THE POLY SEEMED DISASSOCIATED POSTERIOR FROM TIBIA IMPLANT (LOT # 1949231). THE SURGEON THEN REMOVED THE POLY AND REQUESTED A SECOND ONE (LOT # 1949232). WITH THE SECOND POLY AFTER APPEARED TO NOT LOCK IN THE BACK AFTER IMPACTING, THE SURGEON REQUESTED A THIRD POLY. AFTER CLEANING OUT SOFT TISSUE AND PLACING THE KNEE IN DEEP FLEXION, THE POLY LOCKED IN PLACE. AFTER CLOSING THE PATIENT AND PERFORMING ROM THE KNEE APPEARED TO BE STABLE AND THE SURGEON APPEARED TO BE SATISFIED WITH THE FUNCTION OF THE KNEE. THE PROCESSED ADDED ONLY A COUPLE OF MINUTES TO THE ENTIRE CASE." [CUSTOMER]
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17040228 ↗MalfunctionJun 1, 2023Positioning Failure; Positioning Failure
AS REPORTED TO LB ON 2022/06/28, PER K. N.: "ANOTHER POLY INSERT DIDN'T ENGAGE INTO TIBIAL BASE PLATE. ANOTHER POLY HAD TO BE USED INSTEAD." [CUSTOMER].
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 17040188 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K202924. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2541-2025 · Jul 31, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedLinkSymphoKnee System, Tibial Component, Modular, Symmetric, Sz. 5, CoCrMo/TiNbN, cemented, Fixed. REF Number: 880-100/50
- Z-1702-2025 · Apr 3, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedTibial Augment; Item Numbers: (1) 880-331/11 (Sz. 1-2 - cemented x-sm), (2) 880-331/12 (Sz. 1-2 - cemented sm), (3) 880-331/13 (Sz. 1-2 - cemented md), (4) 880-331/21 (Sz. 1-2 - ce
- Z-1701-2025 · Apr 3, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedL-Shaped Femoral Augment; Item Numbers: (1) 880-320/12 (Sz. 0 - cemented sm), (2) 880-320/22 (Sz. 0 - cemented lg), (3) 880-321/12 (Sz. 1-2 - cemented sm), (4) 880-321/22 (Sz. 1-2
- Z-1700-2025 · Apr 3, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedPosterior Femoral Augment; Item Numbers: (1) 880-310/11 (Sz. 0 - cemented sm), (2) 880-310/21 (Sz. 0 - cemented lg), (3) 880-311/11 (Sz. 1-2 - cemented sm), (4) 880-311/21 (Sz. 1-2
- Z-1699-2025 · Apr 3, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedDistal Femoral Augment; Item Numbers: (1) 880-300/11 (Sz. 0 - cemented sm), (2) 880-300/21 (Sz. 0 - cemented lg), (3) 880-301/11 (Sz. 1-2 - cemented sm), (4) 880-301/21 (Sz. 1-2 -
- Z-1372-2025 · Feb 14, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedModular Stem cylindrical, Tilastan, press-fit cementless, L= 80 mm, DIA = 11 mm, Product Code: 880-601/11
- Z-1373-2025 · Feb 14, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedModular Stem cylindrical, Tilastan, press-fit cementless, L= 80 mm, DIA = 12 mm, Product Code: 880-601/12
- Z-1374-2025 · Feb 14, 2025 · Open, ClassifiedModular Stem cylindrical, Tilastan, press-fit cementless, L= 80 mm, DIA = 13 mm, Product Code: 880-601/13
- Z-1674-2023 · Apr 25, 2023 · Open, ClassifiedLINK SymphoKnee System L-Shaped Femoral Augment, Medial-Right/Lateral-Left, Sz 5-6 Tilastan, cemented. Intended for primary and revision total knee replacement. Item Number: 880-32
- Z-2067-2023 · Dec 23, 2022 · Open, ClassifiedLinkSymphoKnee Distal Femoral Augment - Tilastan - Size. 7-8, Lateral-Right/Medial-Left, 5mm-Intended for primary and revision total knee replacement in skeletally mature patients.
- Z-2066-2023 · Dec 23, 2022 · Open, ClassifiedLinkSymphoKnee Distal Femoral Augment - Tilastan - Size 7-8, Medial-Right/Lateral Left, 5mm- Intended for primary and revision total knee replacement in skeletally mature patients.
Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices
- R3 71363077Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER461 reports
- NA 71364009Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER174 reports
- JOURNEY 74012415Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER163 reports
- JOURNEY 74012416Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER163 reports
- JOURNEY 74012414Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER129 reports
- GENESIS II 71440194Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER114 reports
- GENESIS II 71440842Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER113 reports
- JOURNEY 74018901Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER106 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page