Skip to content

Endo-Model Modular Knee Prosthesis System 15-8521/08Recalls & reported problems

WALDEMAR LINK GmbH & Co. KG · Rotational Knee Joint Prosthesis,Femoral component, condylus replacement · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Endo-Model Modular Knee Prosthesis System (64)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 04026575383214), received between Oct 25, 2024 and Oct 28, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 2 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Fracture1
  • Malposition of Device1
  • Naturally Worn1

Patient problems

  • Extraskeletal ossification1
  • Failure of Implant1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Osteopenia/ Osteoporosis1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 28, 2024Fracture; Malposition of Device; Naturally Worn; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Fracture; Malposition of Device; Naturally Worn; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    RECEIVED INFORMATION REGARDING LOOSENING COMPONENTS FOR A PROCEDURE COMPLETED ON (B)(6) 2023. NO EVENT DATE PROVIDED. AWAITING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. UPDATED (B)(6) 2024: REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2024. IT WAS CONFIRMED TO BE A LOOSENING OF THE HINGE . THE ENTIRE FEMORAL CONSTRUCT WAS REMOVED, THE TIBIA WAS LEFT. AS NOTED IN REVISION SURGERY PER (B)(6)., MOTION WAS ASSESSED AND FOUND TO BE TOO MUCH AXIAL AND VARUS/VALGUS MOTION WITH THE HINGE. THE TIBIAL PLATEAU WAS FIRMLY SCREWED INTO THE TIBIA. THE THIMBLE WAS WORN DOWN AND THE DOCTOR WONDERED IF THE POLY LOCKING DETAIL HAD WORN DOWN ON ONE SIDE. SEE ALL IMAGES PROVIDED. IT WAS ALSO NOTED AT THE PROCEDURE THAT THE PROXIMAL TIBIA WAS FRACTURED AND HEALED.[CUSTOMER]

    Patient problems: Extraskeletal ossification; Failure of Implant; Osteopenia/ Osteoporosis

    MAUDE report 20544090 ↗
  • InjuryOct 25, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2024 FOR A FEMORAL COMPONENT THAT WAS ORIGINALLY IMPLANTED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE ENTIRE FEMORAL CONSTRUCT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE HINGE OF THE FEMORAL COMPONENT WAS LOOSE. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT THE PROXIMAL TIBIA WAS FRACTURED AND HAD HEALED.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 20537171 ↗

Other Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices

All Prosthesis, Knee, Femorotibial, Constrained, Cemented, Metal/Polymer devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page